IRC log of #meego for Sunday, 2011-04-17

*** berndhs has quit IRC00:06
*** ivanich has quit IRC00:07
*** berndhs has joined #meego00:07
*** jrocha has quit IRC00:07
*** ivanich has joined #meego00:08
*** balor has quit IRC00:09
*** kW_ has quit IRC00:13
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC00:15
*** tbf_ has quit IRC00:15
*** tackat has quit IRC00:16
*** fcrozat has quit IRC00:19
*** tackat has joined #meego00:19
*** goutam_ has joined #meego00:24
*** stefanoP has quit IRC00:24
*** imppu has quit IRC00:24
*** goutam__ has quit IRC00:24
*** stefanoP has joined #meego00:25
*** goutam__ has joined #meego00:25
*** imppu has joined #meego00:26
*** mikecomputing has quit IRC00:28
*** goutam_ has quit IRC00:29
*** tbf has joined #meego00:31
*** goutam_ has joined #meego00:33
*** goutam__ has quit IRC00:33
*** imppu has quit IRC00:33
*** stefanoP has quit IRC00:33
*** goutam__ has joined #meego00:34
*** stefanoP has joined #meego00:34
*** imppu has joined #meego00:34
*** D-man has quit IRC00:36
*** goutam_ has quit IRC00:38
*** tackat has quit IRC00:42
*** lynxis has joined #meego00:51
*** Jade has quit IRC00:54
*** panaggio_ has joined #meego00:54
*** Jade has joined #meego00:54
*** foolano has joined #meego00:56
*** Okazaki-san has quit IRC00:56
*** panaggio_ has quit IRC00:57
*** Santer has quit IRC01:01
*** gouchi has quit IRC01:02
*** aparna__ has quit IRC01:04
*** toabctl has quit IRC01:08
*** NIN101 has quit IRC01:10
*** piggz has quit IRC01:11
*** anidel_ has joined #meego01:12
*** jrocha has joined #meego01:15
*** anidel has quit IRC01:16
*** wazd has quit IRC01:19
*** goutam_ has joined #meego01:20
*** stefanoP has quit IRC01:20
*** imppu has quit IRC01:20
*** goutam__ has quit IRC01:20
*** goutam__ has joined #meego01:20
*** stefanoP has joined #meego01:20
*** imppu has joined #meego01:21
*** goutam_ has quit IRC01:24
*** tbf has quit IRC01:29
*** cyndis has quit IRC01:30
*** Transformer has joined #meego01:30
*** Transformer has quit IRC01:33
*** lardman has quit IRC01:35
*** jpe has quit IRC01:36
*** slummer has quit IRC01:42
*** slummer has joined #meego01:43
*** jrocha has quit IRC01:46
*** lynxis has quit IRC01:50
berndhs~seen lbt01:52
infobotlbt <~david@Maemo/community/contributor/lbt> was last seen on IRC in channel #meego, 2d 16h 25m 43s ago, saying: 'this should be 1.2 compliance stage'.01:52
berndhs~seen X-fade01:53
infobotx-fade is currently on #maemo #meego. Has said a total of 43 messages. Is idling for 1d 8h 26m 19s, last said: 'mee familia :)'.01:53
*** phl0x81 has quit IRC01:56
CosmoHillthey're hiding02:00
*** Jade has quit IRC02:01
*** Jade has joined #meego02:01
*** lynxis has joined #meego02:04
*** Noobmonk3y has joined #meego02:09
berndhsyeah probably out drinking with the Finns02:13
CosmoHillhuh, "hamster" isn't in my phone's dictionary02:14
*** Richrd has joined #meego02:14
*** mortenvp has quit IRC02:16
*** yanli has joined #meego02:26
*** Sunloung has quit IRC02:31
*** sduclos has quit IRC02:31
Mekhmm, meego community obs seems broken... I'm logged in but whenever I try to do something that requires being logged in it gives a 401 and claims I'm not logged in (while it still says I'm logged in at the top of the page)02:37
Mekand the same issue when trying to use osc02:37
berndhsMek: i see the same02:39
*** andredieb has joined #meego02:39
*** andredieb has joined #meego02:39
*** thomasjfox has quit IRC02:43
*** Transformer has joined #meego02:53
ChameleonSyslrn 2 android pussies,  meego = poop02:56
*** Transformer has quit IRC02:56
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o Stskeeps02:56
*** ChameleonSys has left #meego02:56
*** ChanServ sets mode: -o Stskeeps02:56
CosmoHilltoo slow02:57
*** cyndis has joined #meego02:57
CosmoHillMek and berndhs, I doubt it will be fixed before monday02:58
berndhsyeah probably02:58
CosmoHillFinland is GMT+2 right?02:58
Mek+3 in summer I think :)02:58
berndhsi think so, 2 hours east02:58
CosmoHillit's BST atm so yeah02:59
berndhsover there with the old commies02:59
*** kW_ has joined #meego03:02
*** Jade has quit IRC03:08
*** Jade has joined #meego03:09
*** Jade has joined #meego03:09
*** kW_ has quit IRC03:11
*** goutam_ has joined #meego03:12
*** stefanoP has quit IRC03:12
*** goutam__ has quit IRC03:12
*** goutam__ has joined #meego03:12
*** stefanoP has joined #meego03:13
CosmoHillI should go to bed03:13
sofarI was about to say03:16
*** goutam_ has quit IRC03:16
*** roteva has joined #meego03:20
*** roteva has left #meego03:20
CosmoHill:p03:20
*** CosmoHill has quit IRC03:20
*** panaggio_ has joined #meego03:20
*** lauro has joined #meego03:25
*** goutam_ has joined #meego03:25
*** stefanoP has quit IRC03:25
*** imppu has quit IRC03:25
*** goutam__ has quit IRC03:25
*** goutam__ has joined #meego03:26
*** imppu has joined #meego03:26
*** stefanoP has joined #meego03:26
*** Termana has joined #meego03:30
Termanamorning03:30
*** goutam_ has quit IRC03:30
berndhsevening03:30
*** berndhs has quit IRC03:33
*** berndhs has joined #meego03:34
*** MacDrunk has joined #meego03:35
sofarafternoon :)03:36
*** goutam_ has joined #meego03:36
*** stefanoP has quit IRC03:37
*** imppu has quit IRC03:37
*** goutam__ has quit IRC03:37
*** goutam__ has joined #meego03:37
*** imppu has joined #meego03:38
*** stefanoP has joined #meego03:38
*** goutam_ has quit IRC03:41
*** range has quit IRC03:50
*** mikhas has quit IRC03:50
*** Jade has quit IRC03:55
*** rzr has quit IRC04:02
*** andredieb has quit IRC04:08
*** MacDrunk has quit IRC04:09
*** panaggio_ has quit IRC04:11
*** m1ght3th0r has quit IRC04:12
*** m1ght3th0r has joined #meego04:13
*** goutam_ has joined #meego04:14
*** stefanoP has quit IRC04:14
*** imppu has quit IRC04:14
*** goutam__ has quit IRC04:14
*** goutam__ has joined #meego04:15
*** imppu has joined #meego04:15
*** stefanoP has joined #meego04:16
*** goutam_ has quit IRC04:19
*** yanli has quit IRC04:19
*** jani has quit IRC04:20
*** DawnFoster has quit IRC04:31
*** lauro has quit IRC04:37
*** k405 has joined #meego04:43
*** DawnFoster has joined #meego04:52
*** wazd has joined #meego04:57
*** goutam_ has joined #meego05:01
*** timeless_w7ip has left #meego05:01
*** stefanoP has quit IRC05:01
*** imppu has quit IRC05:01
*** goutam__ has quit IRC05:01
*** goutam__ has joined #meego05:01
*** stefanoP has joined #meego05:02
*** imppu has joined #meego05:02
*** yanli has joined #meego05:04
*** beford has joined #meego05:05
*** goutam_ has quit IRC05:06
*** Jade has joined #meego05:22
*** Jade has joined #meego05:22
*** k405 has quit IRC05:22
*** thuttu77 has quit IRC05:25
*** berndhs has left #meego05:27
*** Evanescence has joined #meego05:35
*** wazd has quit IRC05:41
*** berndhs has joined #meego05:45
*** lynxis has quit IRC05:47
*** lolloo has joined #meego05:49
*** pcfe has quit IRC05:55
*** pcfe has joined #meego05:55
*** pcfe has joined #meego05:55
*** goutam_ has joined #meego05:57
*** stefanoP has quit IRC05:57
*** imppu has quit IRC05:57
*** goutam__ has quit IRC05:57
*** goutam__ has joined #meego05:57
*** stefanoP has joined #meego05:58
*** imppu has joined #meego05:59
*** goutam_ has quit IRC06:01
*** jumoit has joined #meego06:04
*** Termana has quit IRC06:04
*** jumoit has left #meego06:05
*** jumoit has joined #meego06:05
*** andyross has joined #meego06:07
*** Unmenschlich has joined #meego06:09
*** Unmensch has quit IRC06:11
*** akeripper has joined #meego06:14
*** puffin has joined #meego06:17
*** arvind_khadri has joined #meego06:17
*** githogori has joined #meego06:22
*** jumoit has left #meego06:23
*** arvind_khadri has quit IRC06:25
*** arvind_khadri has joined #meego06:26
*** arvind_khadri has joined #meego06:26
*** arvind_k has joined #meego06:30
*** arvind_khadri has quit IRC06:33
*** puffin has quit IRC06:34
*** Termana has joined #meego06:38
*** berndhs has left #meego06:41
*** arvind_k has quit IRC06:41
*** toggles_ has quit IRC06:44
*** toggles has joined #meego06:45
*** araujo has quit IRC06:49
*** Milhouse has quit IRC06:54
*** arvind_k has joined #meego06:54
*** m1ght3th0r has quit IRC06:57
*** Jade has quit IRC06:57
*** Milhouse has joined #meego06:58
*** Milhouse has quit IRC06:58
*** Milhouse has joined #meego06:58
*** bigbrovar has joined #meego06:59
*** acydlord has joined #meego07:17
*** m1ght3th0r has joined #meego07:19
*** larin has quit IRC07:20
*** larin has joined #meego07:20
*** m1ght3th0r has quit IRC07:23
*** m1ght3th0r has joined #meego07:26
*** dani_l has quit IRC07:29
*** DocScrutinizer has quit IRC07:31
*** DocScrutinizer has joined #meego07:31
*** dani_l has joined #meego07:31
*** timeless_xchat has joined #meego07:43
timeless_xchatany nokians awake?07:44
*** oopss has joined #meego07:47
*** andredieb has joined #meego07:49
*** andredieb has joined #meego07:49
*** oopss has left #meego07:50
*** Milhouse has quit IRC07:52
*** andredieb has quit IRC07:53
*** thiago has quit IRC07:53
*** timeless_xchat has quit IRC07:54
*** Milhouse has joined #meego07:56
*** fernando__ has joined #meego08:04
*** psycho_oreos has quit IRC08:05
*** psycho_oreos has joined #meego08:06
*** Santer has joined #meego08:07
*** ksinny has joined #meego08:09
*** rigved has joined #meego08:12
*** bigbrovar has quit IRC08:14
*** akeripper has quit IRC08:19
*** andyross has quit IRC08:25
*** MoRpHeUz has quit IRC08:42
*** MoRpHeUz has joined #meego08:42
*** MoRpHeUz has joined #meego08:42
*** toabctl has joined #meego08:44
*** arvind_k has quit IRC08:47
*** itbaron has joined #meego08:51
*** kimitake is now known as kimitake_idle08:54
*** arvind_k has joined #meego08:58
*** rigved has left #meego09:00
*** gaveen has joined #meego09:08
*** gaveen has joined #meego09:08
*** Matan[M] has joined #meego09:13
*** goutam_ has joined #meego09:16
*** imppu has quit IRC09:16
*** stefanoP has quit IRC09:16
*** goutam__ has quit IRC09:16
*** stefanoP has joined #meego09:16
*** goutam__ has joined #meego09:16
*** imppu has joined #meego09:17
*** goutam_ has quit IRC09:21
*** Termana has quit IRC09:27
*** Venemo has joined #meego09:28
*** Jade has joined #meego09:29
*** Jade has joined #meego09:29
*** infobot has quit IRC09:34
*** wmarone has quit IRC09:35
*** wmarone_ has joined #meego09:35
*** Jade has quit IRC09:37
*** Jade has joined #meego09:44
*** Termana has joined #meego09:44
*** ubIx has joined #meego09:48
*** ubIx_ has quit IRC09:49
*** sheepbat has quit IRC09:50
*** beford has quit IRC09:54
*** fernando__ has quit IRC09:56
*** araujo has joined #meego09:56
*** onen|openBmap has joined #meego10:01
*** Matan[M] has quit IRC10:02
*** sheepbat has joined #meego10:02
*** lcuk has joined #meego10:06
*** goutam_ has joined #meego10:06
*** goutam__ has quit IRC10:07
*** imppu has quit IRC10:07
*** stefanoP has quit IRC10:07
*** MacDrunk has joined #meego10:07
*** Venemo has quit IRC10:07
*** goutam__ has joined #meego10:07
*** mmeeks has joined #meego10:07
*** imppu has joined #meego10:08
*** stefanoP has joined #meego10:08
*** toabctl has quit IRC10:08
* lcuk does a somersault back into the channel10:10
*** MacDrunk has quit IRC10:11
*** goutam_ has quit IRC10:11
*** mmeeks has quit IRC10:12
Stskeepsmorn lcuk10:12
lcukhey Stskeeps \o how is Tampere?10:12
Stskeepsit was good, now in hel(l)10:12
* lcuk just got back from holiday10:13
Stskeepswe all assumed you were dead :P10:13
lcukyeah, the pile of emails and twitter messages told me as much10:13
lcukjust taking vacation early because of Tracy bump10:14
timophhuh. lcuk is alive?10:14
Stskeepsback from the dead. get him, he's a zombie!10:14
* lcuk is now advanced AI10:14
timoph:D10:15
lcukI saw some bits of the talks yesterday10:16
*** balor has joined #meego10:16
lcukbut is there a central place for the writeups?10:16
dm8tbrlcuk: there will be hopefully better recordings *sigh*10:16
dm8tbrat some point our streaming totally crapped out10:16
lcukdm8tbr, it happens10:16
lcukkeeps you busy!10:16
dm8tbryeh10:17
dm8tbrI've got prolly 150G worth of DV footage from one cam only10:17
dm8tbr720p IIRC10:17
*** fcrozat has joined #meego10:17
lcukMyrtti has also got some recordings10:17
dm8tbryeah, they were also shooting with n8s etc10:17
dm8tbrand we have stream-dumps10:18
lcukgood!10:18
*** Venemo has joined #meego10:18
lcukit would be interesting to get the collaborative editing apps up and running and pool all the media10:19
lcukhi Venemo \o10:19
*** mmeeks has joined #meego10:19
*** goutam_ has joined #meego10:20
lcukmorning mmeeks \o10:20
Venemohey lcuk! :)10:20
*** imppu has quit IRC10:20
*** stefanoP has quit IRC10:20
*** goutam__ has quit IRC10:20
Venemolcuk, long time no see :P10:20
lcuknot that long, only a holiday.10:20
*** goutam__ has joined #meego10:20
*** imppu has joined #meego10:20
*** thuttu77 has joined #meego10:20
*** stefanoP has joined #meego10:21
*** mmeeks has quit IRC10:23
*** goutam_ has quit IRC10:24
*** MostafaDaneshvar has joined #meego10:24
*** goutam_ has joined #meego10:25
*** imppu has quit IRC10:25
*** stefanoP has quit IRC10:25
*** goutam__ has quit IRC10:25
*** mmeeks has joined #meego10:26
*** goutam__ has joined #meego10:26
*** imppu has joined #meego10:26
*** stefanoP has joined #meego10:27
*** goutam_ has quit IRC10:30
*** terietor has joined #meego10:30
*** mmeeks has quit IRC10:31
lcukVenemo, http://twitter.com/lcuk/status/5918257071325593610:34
Venemonice :)10:34
*** mirr0r has quit IRC10:41
*** mmeeks has joined #meego10:42
*** terietor has quit IRC10:42
*** NIN101 has joined #meego10:44
*** Venemo has quit IRC10:51
*** Venemo has joined #meego10:53
*** ketas has quit IRC10:55
*** mmeeks has quit IRC10:56
*** ksinny has quit IRC10:58
lcuktimoph, were there any hiccups with the meego-fi development usc stick or did it happily boot meego and let people concentrate on making apps?10:58
timophah. it wasn't that kind of stick. We just collected different meego images, etc. into it. Haven't tried the stick from appup lab yet11:02
lcuktimoph, ooh so you have a multiboot usb stick somewhere?11:03
Myrttiit didn't work for me11:03
lcukmorning Myrtti \o11:03
Myrttimoin :-)11:03
*** amarsman_nl has joined #meego11:03
*** srikanth_RST has joined #meego11:05
srikanth_RSTHello Any one knows which image i can flash to exopc tablet11:06
srikanth_RSThttp://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/1.1.90/1.1.99.2.20110412.6/images/11:06
Myrttipinetrail11:06
*** jukkaeklund has joined #meego11:08
lcuksrikanth_RST, there is a nice documentation page also leading you to image http://meego.com/downloads/releases/1.2/meego-tablet-developer-preview  cc jukkaeklund, thanks \o11:09
timophlcuk: no. nothing that fancy. just plain old files :)11:10
* dm8tbr wonders if it will fail in colourful ways if I change the repos and zyp up11:10
jukkaeklundsrikanth_RST, yeah I'm just getting that11:10
*** MacDrunk has joined #meego11:13
*** amarsman_nl has joined #meego11:13
* timoph goes out to vote and buy somekind of stand and a kb for exopc hacking11:14
*** Richrd_ has joined #meego11:14
srikanth_RSTlcuk: jukkaeklund: thanks. I will try now11:15
*** onen|openBmap has quit IRC11:17
miherois there some official stand, seems to be some connector at the bottom11:17
jukkaeklundmihero, I think so11:17
srikanth_RSTMyrtti:Thanks11:17
*** srikanth_RST1 has joined #meego11:20
miherohmm, seems that same stands work for wetab and some other tablets11:21
*** srikanth_RST has quit IRC11:22
Myrttiso as I was saying, you don't need a keyboard to flash the ExoPC11:22
Myrttithe boot selection can be done with the hotspot on the left top corner11:22
Myrttitap once to move the selection to "install only" and hold down (for a long time) to select11:23
dm8tbris that swype thing only in the preinstalled image or also in the newer ones?11:24
Myrttiit's not in the daily builds11:24
Myrttiif you go to the intel site and download an image from there, it's there11:25
*** balor has quit IRC11:25
dm8tbrah, ok11:25
dm8tbrjust curious, not that I really care thaaat much11:25
*** NIN101 has quit IRC11:25
lcukMyrtti, the hotspot in the corner, is that just light sensor?11:25
*** srikanth_RST has joined #meego11:25
Myrttino11:25
Myrttiit's actually a button of sorts11:26
MyrttiI suppose11:26
MyrttiI don't know the technique used, so I suppose it could be a light sensor11:26
Stskeepsproximity sensor, maybe11:26
dm8tbrwould suck in the dark ;)11:26
Myrttibut it is a valid button and it can be used to interact in the tablet ui too11:27
lcukStskeeps, yes that is the technical description I was thinking of11:27
jukkaeklundits quite nice solution11:27
MyrttiI found it by accident11:27
Myrttiquite nifty11:27
*** srikanth_RST1 has quit IRC11:27
jukkaeklundif its polling though wondering about power consumption11:27
jukkaeklundwe should try to use that in N900 also, unless its draining battery11:27
Myrttiif a proximity sensor doesn't poll, it's quite useless ;-)11:28
Myrtti(in the sense I understand polling)11:28
*** Richrd__ has joined #meego11:28
lcukjukkaeklund, I have seen apps using proximity on n90011:30
jukkaeklundin meego?11:30
*** Richrd_ has quit IRC11:30
* jukkaeklund wondering then tablet test reports are coming to http://qa-reports.meego.com/11:31
Stskeepsgood question11:31
jukkaeklundand next question :)11:32
MyrttiI was just going to file bug reports11:32
Myrttithe facebook connection thingie is broken for me11:32
Myrttiso badly it recovers only with a reboot :-x11:32
Stskeepsthink there was a problem with api keys or somethingg11:32
Stskeepsat some point11:32
Myrttimy only problem is that I can't tap the "Done" button11:32
Myrttiand because of that the configuration dialog is stuck11:33
Myrttiand because the same thingamabob is used to configure everything else, I can't configure for example wifi or panels or anything else once I've tried connecting facebook11:33
jukkaeklundyes, please write them bugs now :)11:33
jukkaeklundlooks like installation is stuck for me11:35
Myrtti(and it seems that I did actually, really really flash the daily build)11:35
Myrttiatleast the image is dated yesterday instead of 12th11:36
*** srikanth_RST1 has joined #meego11:36
*** troys has joined #meego11:36
*** srikanth_RST has quit IRC11:36
jukkaeklundooh, bleading edge11:38
sandst1jukkaeklund: how's the latest tablet image doing?11:38
sandst1wondering whether to go for that or try out the netbook img11:38
*** phinaliumz has quit IRC11:39
jukkaeklundsandst1, installation got stuck for me so don11:39
jukkaeklund't know11:39
sandst1ok11:39
jukkaeklundor handset :)11:39
*** Matan[M] has joined #meego11:39
sandst1yea :)11:40
StskeepsDE could prolly run on there without big issue11:40
jukkaeklundyep, that came to mind11:41
jukkaeklundwant to make make a image? :)11:41
Stskeepsnot using my n900 ;) maybe tomorrow11:42
Stskeepswas sitting and hacking until 4am last night, was good to get that out of my system.. :P11:43
*** troys has left #meego11:44
jukkaeklundStskeeps, good what did you hack?11:45
Stskeepscompiling qt lighthouse and playing with some ideas11:46
*** srikanth_RST has joined #meego11:46
jukkaeklundoh11:47
*** srikanth_RST1 has quit IRC11:47
* sandst1 just booted the netbook img. working except the mouse cursor seems to be attached to the accelerometer :D11:48
jukkaeklund!11:48
*** Matan[M] has quit IRC11:49
*** foolano has quit IRC11:49
Stskeepssandst1: ah, yeah, xorg did that on n900 at some point11:49
Stskeepsthat was fun11:49
sandst1yeap :)11:50
sandst1also the vkb is disabled. i wonder if there's a touch-customized version available11:50
jukkaeklundthat would be swype but its only in Intels images11:51
*** mortenvp has joined #meego11:51
*** Matan[M] has joined #meego11:51
jukkaeklundgot the installation through now, it seems choosing Finnish was not a good idea11:51
sandst1jukkaeklund: thanks for the tip11:52
Myrttilanguage, locale and vkb should be detached from each other, yeah11:53
MyrttiI'd want UK British language, Finnish locale and vkb11:53
*** Richrd_ has joined #meego11:54
timophyep. that's how I'd like to set it up11:54
*** MacDrunk has quit IRC11:55
*** Richrd__ has quit IRC11:57
jukkaeklundgo fix it then :)11:57
timoph:)11:57
timophjust arriving at verkkokauppa to buy some hacking equipment :)11:58
jukkaeklundmouse and keyboard?11:59
lcuktimoph, they sell awesome helicopters!11:59
* lcuk still has little one here11:59
* lcuk will trade upto a bigger one at some point.11:59
*** slummer has quit IRC11:59
timophsome small kb and somekind of stand11:59
Myrttithe note in the package said "includes a stand"12:00
Myrttibtw12:00
timophyep12:00
Myrtti(it didn't)12:00
lcukI made a stand for n810 and n900 :)12:00
timophdouble checked the packaging for it12:01
MyrttiI'll probably make something out of sugru12:01
*** balor has joined #meego12:01
Myrttisince I don't have shrinktube or anything12:01
lcukmaybe the box itself is a stand12:01
* lcuk likes the ideapad 12:02
lcukit is self standing12:02
lcukand pre includes a keyboard !12:02
Myrttiyou're just jealous12:03
*** Matan[M] has quit IRC12:03
sandst1this seems to be the very latest image: http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/trunk/latest/images/meego-tablet-ia32-pinetrail/meego-tablet-ia32-pinetrail-1.1.99.2.20110412.6.img12:04
Myrttisandst1: it's not ;-) there's daily builds too :-P12:04
Myrtti(but I suspect they're not as stable)12:04
jukkaeklundtrunk should be stable12:04
jukkaeklundso http://download.meego.com/trunk-daily/builds/trunk/1.1.99.3.20110415.3/images/meego-tablet-ia32-pinetrail/12:05
dm8tbrit also claims the device is passively cooled12:05
jukkaeklundheh12:05
dm8tbrerr, scroll fail12:05
jukkaeklundtablet that has a cooling fan12:05
jukkaeklundoops pressing power to "standby" is not a good idea12:06
sandst1ah, thanks12:06
Myrttiaw man12:07
Myrttihttp://kevindark.co.uk/Images/ExoStuff/TheDock.jpg the dock would be nice12:07
jukkaeklundanybody tried to update on the fly with zypper?12:07
jukkaeklund(and how to do that?)12:08
sandst1jukkaeklund: zypper ref && zypper up. worked at least on the netbook12:08
jukkaeklundbit hard without vkb or keyboard though :|12:09
sandst1the IP is shown in the connectivity settings & there's an ssh daemon running12:09
jukkaeklundah of course12:10
dm8tbroooh there is ssh? nice12:10
* dm8tbr wanted to install thinking there isn't and that failed because the repo is gone12:10
dm8tbrjukkaeklund: I thought of that too. didn't get around to trying yet12:11
jukkaeklundhmm, doesn't want to connect with ssh though12:11
Myrttiyou have failed, young padawan12:12
jukkaeklundyes I have12:12
*** balor has quit IRC12:12
Myrttiworks for me12:12
jukkaeklundand thanks for the young part12:12
jukkaeklundprkl, if I have to start fiddling with WLAN setup for that12:13
jukkaeklunddoes it do over USB?12:13
MyrttiAll repositories have been refreshed.12:14
MyrttiNothing to do.12:15
Myrtti:-|12:15
sandst1Myrtti: so you're already using the latest image?:)12:15
Myrttiyup12:16
Myrttiflashed it last night12:16
sandst1ok. so there really is nothing to update12:16
*** goutam_ has joined #meego12:20
*** stefanoP has quit IRC12:20
*** imppu has quit IRC12:20
*** goutam__ has quit IRC12:20
*** goutam__ has joined #meego12:21
*** eager has joined #meego12:21
*** imppu has joined #meego12:21
*** stefanoP has joined #meego12:21
dm8tbrdid anyone get the alarm working? I can't set the time12:24
*** Armi^ has joined #meego12:24
*** balor has joined #meego12:24
*** goutam_ has quit IRC12:25
jukkaeklundexopc stand, http://kevindark.co.uk/Products/Stands_For_EXOPC_VIBE.aspx12:27
poutsidm8tbr, I think that was mentioned in the gotchas list12:28
poutsithe 2-sheet thingy in the plastic bag with the stick12:28
dm8tbryeah, glanced over the list but didn't memorize that item12:29
dm8tbrright bottom of the list there it is12:29
*** jpe has joined #meego12:29
MyrttiI almost want to get the docking station12:33
poutsiheh, 393 packages to update, I wonder if it'll take off under the power of the fan12:34
*** arvind_k has quit IRC12:34
*** lbt_away is now known as lbt12:41
*** ketas has joined #meego12:46
*** liyan has joined #meego12:46
*** yanli has quit IRC12:50
Myrttithe appup client is somewhat horrible :-D12:51
MyrttiI can see why it's not public yet :-D12:52
*** balor has quit IRC12:52
*** Richrd has quit IRC12:52
jukkaeklundhas to be public if you got it, where is that?12:55
Myrttihttp://appdeveloper.intel.com/en-us/meego-sdk-suite12:58
*** juliank has joined #meego12:58
*** juliank has joined #meego12:58
Myrttiwell it is public but in beta12:58
Myrttioh, not even that12:58
Myrttialpha12:58
lcukdoes anybody know whether there are any git statistics tools, to indicate contribution breakdown on a repository?12:58
*** ivparamonov has joined #meego12:58
poutsidefine contribution breakdown?13:00
*** srikanth_RST has quit IRC13:00
*** Richrd__ has joined #meego13:00
*** Richrd_ has quit IRC13:01
lcukpoutsi, at most basic level, lines of code per person13:01
lcukbut it is not quite so simple with binary elements13:01
lcuk(the gitstats website is not working)13:02
poutsiyeah, just ran into that snag myself13:04
poutsithere are a few others mentioned here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1828874/generating-statistics-from-git-repository13:04
jukkaeklundMyrtti, thanks its dated to middle of Feb so will not bother..13:05
*** mirr0r has joined #meego13:05
lcukpoutsi, thanks was on there myself too13:06
*** balor has joined #meego13:06
*** mirr0r has quit IRC13:07
*** goutam_ has joined #meego13:07
*** mirr0r has joined #meego13:07
*** toabctl has joined #meego13:07
*** imppu has quit IRC13:07
*** stefanoP has quit IRC13:07
*** goutam__ has quit IRC13:07
*** imppu has joined #meego13:07
*** goutam__ has joined #meego13:07
lbtDawnFoster: ping13:07
*** stefanoP has joined #meego13:08
lcuk\o lbt13:09
lbthey lcuk ... glad you're back in the real world13:10
lcukhah, this is the real world: http://twitter.com/lcuk/status/59182570713255936 but I am somewhat pleased to have internet back now :)13:11
*** Richrd has joined #meego13:11
*** goutam_ has quit IRC13:12
lbt*g*13:12
* lcuk has not done somersaults for half a lifetime!13:13
lcukI had forgotten how to do them at first13:13
* lbt smells a tutorial for SF201113:13
lcukhaha!13:13
* jukkaeklund wonders what kind of person forgets his WLAN box password13:14
lcuklast time I stood up infront of people and tried to show them what was needed I got laughed at in school13:14
*** Richrd__ has quit IRC13:15
lcukjukkaeklund, try 1234513:15
jukkaeklundnope13:16
poutsinote to self: change combination on luggage13:16
*** eager has quit IRC13:16
jukkaeklund:)13:16
timoph:D13:16
*** ivparamonov has quit IRC13:19
alteregolcuk: where did your internet go?13:21
lcukalterego, see the photo13:21
*** toabctl has quit IRC13:21
lcukno internet on holiday :)13:21
*** Harry1991 has joined #meego13:21
lcukspending time with family13:22
lcukwe even managed to get luke to put his phone down for a couple of days13:22
poutsieh, zypper's a bit too quiet for my tastes13:22
poutsithought my upgrade hung when in fact it was just rebuilding locales13:22
alteregolcuk: yeah, I knew you were on Holida, I was trying to tell everyone that you'd gone on holiday because a few people were getting worried :P13:26
*** wazd has joined #meego13:27
lcukyeah I heard, the pile of emails and messages when I got back to civilisation helped clarify though lol13:27
alteregoHahah13:28
*** [XeN] has joined #meego13:30
*** kW_ has joined #meego13:30
*** Armi^ has quit IRC13:30
lcukalterego, had more email whilst I was gone for a break than proceeding few months!13:31
* lcuk still has not caught up with everything13:31
*** balor has quit IRC13:33
alteregoWell, sounds like you've been having a good time though :)13:37
*** mirr0r is now known as fiberspeed13:37
*** Richrd has quit IRC13:38
lcukalterego, straining many different muscles :)13:42
JaffaMorning, all13:43
lcukmorning Jaffa \o13:44
JaffaAnything interesting come out of #meegofi or anything else this week for MWKN?13:44
JaffaLight on contributions so far, but maybe it's a quiet week...13:44
*** balor has joined #meego13:45
lcukJaffa, once you publish todays edition later, ping me I need to catch up and mwkn is generally designed for such a task \o13:46
Myrttimmmmmm tea13:46
lcukJaffa, not exactly news, but n900 on a beach takes wonderful photos! :P13:47
Jaffalcuk: Currently it's got two stories in and so not much catch-up capability will be provided :-/13:47
lcukand the sand does come out of the slider eventually13:47
Jaffalcuk: heh13:47
JaffaMy camera takes horrid photos now cos of all the gunk caught around the lens13:47
MyrttiJaffa: apart from Reuters telling that LG will publish a mobile phone and LG later correcting them?13:47
lcukJaffa, ? what gunk13:48
JaffaMyrtti: LG sayigng they're *not* releasing a [MeeGo] phone?13:48
Jaffalcuk: Pocket detritus, e.g. tissue dust.13:49
*** mikecomputing has joined #meego13:49
lcukJaffa, the N900 camera does take excellent shots http://twitter.com/lcuk/status/5918257071325593613:49
Jaffalcuk: Indeed13:49
lcukahhh that pic was taken from tracys n90013:49
lcukthat gets thrown into her purse13:49
lcukI worry everytime, but the screen protector is doing its job13:49
MyrttiJaffa: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/15/lg-steps-in-to-develop-handset-version-of-meego-sorry-nokia/13:50
Jaffalcuk: Cool13:50
JaffaMyrtti: ta13:50
Myrtti(source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/15/us-mobile-software-meego-idUSTRE73E2CT20110415)13:51
Myrttithe original content of the article was a bit different13:52
MyrttiI did read it a bit confused and wondered where exactly did Valtteri say LG were going to publish a phone13:52
JaffaEngadget in inaccuracy shock )13:53
JaffaThanks for the link, though13:53
MyrttiI'd say Reuters editors13:53
MyrttiReuters did the mistake, and it spread like a wild fire13:53
*** goutam_ has joined #meego13:53
*** stefanoP has quit IRC13:54
*** imppu has quit IRC13:54
*** goutam__ has quit IRC13:54
*** puffin has joined #meego13:54
JaffaMyrtti: Ah, fair enough13:54
*** goutam__ has joined #meego13:54
*** imppu has joined #meego13:55
*** stefanoP has joined #meego13:55
*** pohly has joined #meego13:58
JaffaErr, is news.meego.com and planet.meego.com supposed to actually, y'know, work?13:58
JaffaThe links on khyber's two posts are just loopback links13:58
*** goutam_ has quit IRC13:58
*** Sunloung has joined #meego13:59
*** Myrtti has quit IRC14:02
VenemoJaffa, this reminds me of the funny situation after Nokia's annoucement. then, mxr.meego.com pointed to microsoft.com for about a week.14:07
Stskeepscos of some idiot showing that volunteer hosting cant be trusted.14:08
*** myrtti has joined #meego14:08
*** balor has quit IRC14:09
JaffaVenemo: Annoying14:09
*** Venemo has quit IRC14:09
*** Termana has quit IRC14:09
myrttiaw, ran out of cheese14:11
* lbt quietly notes that the Intel SDK T-shirts say www.meego.org ....14:14
Stskeepslbt: that we should note to dawn..14:16
*** Venemo has joined #meego14:17
lbtyep...14:17
lbtshows that they're thinking correctly about meego :)14:18
lbtdid you catch the train?14:18
timophI'm getting more and more annoyed that the ux doesn't offer any sensible way to close apps. "freeing screen space" is a poor excuse for this design flaw.14:20
*** jukkaeklund has left #meego14:20
jarkko^_timoph: that question has been my mind.. how do you close the apps? :)14:21
jarkko^_for now i have rebooted the device when i wanted switch to another app14:21
timophopen task switcher, press and hold, select close :)14:21
timophor kill them from xterm :p14:22
poutsidid the task switcher come from the corner hotspot?14:22
jarkko^_how task switcher is opened? :)14:22
timophyep. the corner hotspot14:22
jarkko^_aha..14:22
*** wazd_ has joined #meego14:23
timophor if you're using kb: context menu key or holding down the corporate key14:23
*** Bostik has joined #meego14:24
* lcuk likes the descriptive key name14:24
jarkko^_hmm maybe i'll put handset ux pinetrail version for now :)14:25
*** wazd has quit IRC14:25
*** mortenvp has quit IRC14:26
*** DocScrutinizer has quit IRC14:26
* Jaffa suspects lack of close icons is an increasing UI paradigm for mobile, and so, MeeGo14:26
myrttiololololo video ♥14:26
timophyep14:26
*** ucomesdag has quit IRC14:26
poutsino problem there if there's a smart task killer and apps are designed accordingly14:27
myrttiPasila from YLE areena on the exopc ♥14:27
myrttino need for a laptop in bed anymore14:27
*** mortenvp has joined #meego14:27
Jaffapoutsi: You mean apps auto-close?14:27
jarkko^_in short terms it is no problem how apps are closed if it is immediately intuitive to the user :)14:27
poutsiwhaddya know, it booted even after the upgrade stopped halfway14:27
poutsiJaffa, yeah14:27
*** aboyer has joined #meego14:28
ali12341"no close button" has been around (and universally disliked) since windows mobile14:28
poutsijarkko^_, I'd say it's no problem if there's no incentive in closing apps yourself14:28
poutsiali12341, not universally :)14:28
Jaffapoutsi: None of the official MeeGo APIs or guides describe how to build such apps, and Maemo experience suggests most apps won't be designed accordingly if there's more than one way to do it.14:28
poutsiJaffa, and that's a huge issue, yeah14:28
Jaffapoutsi: Perhaps iOS' limited multitasking and guided "multitasking" is a better way of approaching it. Certainly none of the "core" Linux libraries and devices have made it easy.14:29
jarkko^_poutsi: yeah if there's some clear way to get back to apps menu :)14:29
jarkko^_i couldn't figure even that out14:29
jarkko^_so when i started app i was stuck with it until i rebooted :)14:30
JaffaAnd doing "update when not visible" seems harder in Qt (and should be done for free with QML) than it was in a lower-level Hildon/Gtk app.14:30
jarkko^_wasn't very fun user experience14:30
poutsiargh, why doesn't resolv.conf get updated correctly14:31
jarkko^_has anyone already tried handset ux with exopc14:31
lcukjarkko^_, should be same as on the ideapad, afaik it is the same pinetrail image14:32
*** ucomesdag has joined #meego14:32
jarkko^_yeah, exopc is also pinetrail14:33
jarkko^_should work14:33
myrttiI'm feeling slightly stupid, but where exactly can I get more applications to the tablet? AppUp clearly isn't a solution at the moment14:33
RST38hAll moo.14:33
RST38hmyrtti: garage.maemo.org? =)14:33
myrttireally?14:33
RST38hWell behaved Qt apps should recompile and work, shouldn't they?14:34
*** floyd2 has quit IRC14:34
sandst1myrtti: http://apps-beta.meego.com/basecategories/meego/current/netbook/14:37
sandst1should run in the tablet fine14:37
sandst1you'll need access to the community OBS (build.pub.meego.com). send your meego.com username to lbt or X-Fade and they'll enable it14:39
*** goutam_ has joined #meego14:40
*** stefanoP has quit IRC14:40
*** imppu has quit IRC14:40
*** goutam__ has quit IRC14:40
*** goutam__ has joined #meego14:41
myrttithe website is so abysmally bad I think I'll just roll over and die slowly14:41
*** imppu has joined #meego14:41
*** stefanoP has joined #meego14:41
lbtmyrtti: which ?14:41
myrttiapps-beta14:41
myrtti"string(60) "/applications/{$os}/{$string:version}/{$ux}/{$basecategory}/" Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /var/cas_latest/midgardmvc_core/route.php on line 221"14:41
myrtti"thanks a lot"14:42
lbtah, they're probably working on it14:42
myrttiI should hope so... :-)14:42
lbtit's the 'live dev'14:42
*** Termana has joined #meego14:43
myrttican't even download anything14:44
myrttiso I'll just have another cuppa and watch telly14:44
poutsizypper upgrade almost finished14:44
lbtcatch X-Fade and he'll rope you in as a beta tester14:44
poutsialmost squirted coffee out my nose when I saw a package name starting with "prolog"14:45
*** goutam_ has quit IRC14:45
poutsiprobably not prolog the PL though14:45
RST38hwell, as there is no official usable version of Meego for tablets, expecting to have apps for it is kinda too optimistic14:45
poutsino wait I was thinking of cobol :p14:46
poutsisilly14:46
*** larin has quit IRC14:47
*** Armi^ has joined #meego14:47
myrttiRST38h: to be honest, I had no expectations at all. I just literally couldn't find any place to get any apps for any platform from the top of my head14:51
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego14:52
*** tackat has joined #meego14:54
*** myrtti is now known as Myrtti14:54
MyrttiI suppose I should've stayed out of the AppUp lab altogether and allow someone who can actually develop those apps to have the device14:55
*** jeaha has joined #meego14:55
*** balor has joined #meego14:55
jeahahallo hat das nokia n900 omap 3 oder omap 414:55
jeahahi, the nokia n900 omap 3 or 4 omap14:56
sandst1poutsi: actually the resource policy framework's rules Are written in Prolog :)14:56
alteregoOMAP 314:56
alteregoCould you not google that?14:56
*** mattock has joined #meego14:56
jeahathx14:56
jeahai have gegoogelt14:56
Termanaalterego, pfft do you know how much harder it is to google something than to join an irc server and ask it in an irrelevant channel?14:57
sandst1poutsi: https://meego.gitorious.org/maemo-multimedia/prolog14:57
sandst1poutsi: http://conference2010.meego.com/session/policy-framework-flexible-way-orchestrate-multiple-functionalities-meego-devices14:57
Termana/say /sarcasm14:57
Termanadarn it14:57
Termanaeveryone gets the drift anyway14:58
jonniMyrtti: you can always make it dualboot to win7 if you want to have some apps to run on :)14:59
Myrttijonni: if I'll go the dualboot way, I'll take something I know how to use - like ubuntu.14:59
Myrttiah nevermind I'm just getting depressed15:01
Myrtticheers, have a nice day15:01
*** XeN_ has joined #meego15:01
*** dwmw2___ has quit IRC15:02
*** dwmw2___ has joined #meego15:02
*** [XeN] has quit IRC15:04
RST38hMyrtti: there is always maemo! :)15:05
* Jaffa was thinking earlier today about vendors giving out devices. It's cool and funky to have a new toy, but if it doesn't do *anything* usefully or have a market ready and waiting for apps, will anyone develop for it. Nokia's free E7 was like this (it didn't do anything beyond my N900, so why'd I develop for it), the IdeaPads with MeeGo Netbook may be similar.15:05
RST38hOk,not always, but for a while. Hopefully, Meego will reach the sameor better state by the year's end15:05
RST38hJaffa: Well, I use E7 for development.15:06
JaffaWhereas I develop for the N900 cos it already meets a load of my use cases, so enriching it benefits me.15:06
*** thiago has joined #meego15:06
RST38hIt is kinda enriching too, in monetary sense.15:06
JaffaRST38h: Verifying the cross-platformness of my Qt apps, sure.15:06
RST38hNah, not even using Qt15:06
RST38hAvkon here.15:06
JaffaRST38h: Indeed, so the "ready made market" is met there.15:06
JaffaRST38h: Masochist ;-)15:07
RST38hRealist: got shitload of code using it15:07
*** Openfree^ has quit IRC15:09
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego15:10
*** amjad has joined #meego15:11
*** Harry1991 has quit IRC15:12
*** halvors has joined #meego15:18
*** halvors has quit IRC15:20
*** XeN_ has quit IRC15:21
*** notmart has joined #meego15:21
*** amjad has quit IRC15:22
*** Harry1991 has joined #meego15:27
*** toabctl has joined #meego15:31
*** amjad has joined #meego15:35
*** foolano has joined #meego15:40
*** goutam_ has joined #meego15:42
*** stefanoP has quit IRC15:42
*** imppu has quit IRC15:42
*** goutam__ has quit IRC15:42
*** goutam__ has joined #meego15:43
*** imppu has joined #meego15:43
*** stefanoP has joined #meego15:43
*** goutam_ has quit IRC15:47
*** Openfree^ has quit IRC15:47
*** andre__ has joined #meego15:49
*** andre__ has quit IRC15:49
*** andre__ has joined #meego15:49
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego15:51
*** amjad has quit IRC15:52
lbtJaffa: actually what happened at the summit was Intel worked some more on bootstrapping the MeeGo Apps story15:56
lbtThey do have some strong messages - and they are offering early app-developers initiatives (including $50k or flying a MiG)15:57
lbtthe SDK still needs a little work but it's supposed to be useful15:58
*** raster has quit IRC15:58
* Stskeeps was rather impressed with general appup story15:58
lbtI'm going to see about installing it tonight15:58
lbtyep .. me too15:58
lbtvery opensource friendly15:58
timophyep15:58
Stskeepsand less of a bullshit store15:58
lbtlicense-wise, not surrounds ;)15:58
lbtBernie and I had a chat - they want to support component dependencies ... but it's hard15:59
lbtthey're going to *investigate* funding a community-OBS plugin to go from MeeGo:Apps -> AppUp16:00
timophnice16:00
lbtyou will be able to ask for $ for OSS apps16:00
lbt(sounds like they may want to use OBS internally later to facilitate multi-targets for devs - so the plugin would come from there too)16:01
lbtThey have multi-lingual support (provided you count 0, 1, multi)16:01
timophso I could have the apps for free in cobs and ask money for the same apps through appup :P16:01
lbtyes16:01
lbtand if you get Dixons users, they pay a small fee, community users get it for nothing16:02
timophinteresting16:02
lbtyes16:02
lbtWe should focus on GPL being "open source", and "libre".... not free16:03
timophtrue16:03
lbt(most dixons users prolly don't speak french ;) )16:03
lbtfrench devs lose out16:03
lbtwin win16:03
timoph:D16:03
*** panaggio_ has joined #meego16:03
*** amjad has joined #meego16:05
ali12341if you can put OSS apps in a appstore, what's to stop people constantly undercutting each other by $0.01?16:07
*** mulvad has joined #meego16:09
dm8tbrali12341: trademark the name of your project, sue them into oblivion. *duck* *run* ouch!16:10
*** jeaha has quit IRC16:10
*** fcrozat has left #meego16:10
lbtali12341: excellent question - but I suggest the AppUp store should respect copyright16:11
lbtso if the copyright holder asks the store to prevent a user from distributing via the AppUp store.. that's OK16:12
lbt"debate"16:12
*** jmorgan has quit IRC16:12
*** berndhs has joined #meego16:12
ali12341copyright holder... on GPL software?16:12
lbtyes16:12
lbtLicense != copyright16:12
ali12341if you said trademark i could agree with you16:12
lbtnot at all16:13
lbtI hold the copyright on my app16:13
ali12341yeah16:13
lbtI choose to distribute using GPL16:13
lbtyou may distribute it too16:13
lbtyou may sell it16:13
ali12341and if you impose extra conditions like "you can't put my app on appup" then you've just violated the GPL16:13
lbtyou may not oblige the AppUp store to sell it16:13
*** sjg156 has joined #meego16:13
lbtthe condition is not on the distribution16:13
ali12341ah fair point16:13
lbtit is a policy of the store16:13
lbtdesigned to respect the copyright holders wishes16:14
lbtI actually only just realised that16:14
ali12341what if the copyright holder isn't the first person to package the app for appup?16:14
lbtbut I think it's the answer to "how do I stop others selling shopper on appup"16:14
lbtnot a problem16:14
*** wijiji has quit IRC16:14
lbtthe policy is that if the holder objects, the holder is listened to16:15
ali12341if i put in the hard work to port your app to meego, then put it in appup, you can come along and say "i'm the copyright holder" and take my work and sell it yourself?16:15
lbtdon't try selling the kernel ;)16:15
lbtyes16:15
ali12341well that's pretty lame16:15
lbtso talk to me first if yo plan to monetise you greedy bastard ;)16:15
lbtor I'll just get it all16:15
ali12341well i'd just say "hang on, i'm the copyright holder on the parts that make it work on meego"16:16
ali12341then we both lose16:16
lbtfeel free16:16
lbtlose lose16:16
ali12341but personally i would prefer a system where anyone is free to undercut anyone else at any time16:16
lbtain't cooperation great ?16:16
*** ksinny has joined #meego16:16
lbtali12341: pointless16:16
berndhsseems like the reasonable thing would be to talk to the copyright holder first16:16
ali12341not pointless, in fact, it ensures that users get the best possible value16:16
*** goutam_ has joined #meego16:16
lbtberndhs: indeed16:16
*** stefanoP has quit IRC16:16
*** imppu has quit IRC16:16
*** goutam__ has quit IRC16:16
lbtvalue?16:16
ali12341yes value for money when purchasing apps16:17
lbtagain, not at all16:17
lbtstarving your pet poet means no more poems16:17
*** goutam__ has joined #meego16:17
lbtand where does the GPL mention value?16:18
*** stefanoP has joined #meego16:18
ali12341it doesn't, this has nothing to do with the GPL16:18
*** peisanen has quit IRC16:18
lbtit does16:18
ali12341although if you asked RMS about this he'd agree with me16:18
lbtyou only have rights to my SW via the GPLE16:18
*** imppu has joined #meego16:18
lbtask - you're wrong16:18
*** Harry1991 has quit IRC16:18
lbthe has frequently supported cash for code16:19
ali12341lbt: every time RMS does a lecture someone asks him this exact question and the answer is always the same16:19
lbthowever the user (from Dixons) should know they can recompile16:19
lbtrofl16:19
ali12341"how do i stop someone else from selling my code?"16:19
*** amjad has quit IRC16:19
lbtI'm not stopping you16:19
lbtyou can go down to a market and sell it16:19
lbtI'm suggesting the AppUp store has a model to encourage OSS monetisation16:20
ali12341technically you're not stopping me however you are basically entering into an agreement with appup to limit the effectiveness of the GPL to achieve it's goal16:20
lbtyes16:20
lbtso use the post office16:20
lbtand post my app to your users16:20
lbtand they can send you money16:20
lbtand you have to manage that channel16:20
lbtand pay the costs16:20
lbtme and the appup store - we *have* an agreement16:21
ali12341well there's one small problem with that, which is, as we all know, meego devices will be "tivoized" such that you can only install apps from an approved source16:21
lbtthey get 30%16:21
lbtyep16:21
lbthe'll hate that16:21
*** goutam_ has quit IRC16:21
ali12341which means that there will only be once source for a particular GPL app, and the developer can charge whatever they want for it - which is the exact situation the GPL is designed to *prevent* from occuring16:21
lbtnot at all16:22
lbtthe app will be on community OBS16:22
lbtit's on gitorious16:22
ali12341and it's not installable16:22
lbtit comes from appup if you ask for the source16:22
lbtnothing in the GPL obliges me to share16:22
*** mtux has joined #meego16:22
lbthence the Affero license16:22
*** Ian-- has joined #meego16:22
lbtwhich extends sharing to situations where code is not actually distributed16:23
lbtjust because my app is gpl doesn't give you a right to have a copy16:23
ali12341i would say that all the v3 variant would have a problem with this16:23
lbtwhy? show me the clause obliging me to give you my code16:23
lbt*if* I give you the binary (under GPL) I must give you the src16:24
lbtif I don't ... tough16:24
ali12341if you sell me a copy of a GPLv3 app on a locked down device, don't you also have to supply me with any and all means to recompile said app and install it on said locked down device?16:24
lbtif I only choose to distribute via appup and you don't use appup ... tough16:24
lbtyep... community OBS16:24
lbtnb... install it.... not AFAIK16:25
lbtalso, not "run" it either16:25
ali12341it's required if you sell a device like tivo where the firmware is signed, to include the signing key such that a user compiled firmware can be installed on the actual hardware you bought16:26
lbtGPL code is allowed to access a NW service and refuse to run if you don't have an account16:26
lbtI can take your account away if you don't pay16:26
ali12341therefore i would argue the same applies to after market app purchases16:26
lbtthey aren't signed16:26
ali12341appup purchases are not signed?16:26
lbtnot in a way to prevent installation16:27
lbtthey run a NW service to obtain a UID16:27
ali12341so devices which use appup will not need to be jailbroken?16:27
lbtand thereafter use that to restrict runtime16:27
lbtyou can then take my GPL code and remove that16:27
lbtand then share it16:27
ali12341and it will run on the real hardware?16:27
lbtyep16:28
ali12341ok16:28
lbtbut you can't sell it via appup16:28
ali12341that's rather different then16:28
lbt'cos appup requires you have that16:28
ali12341see, i was working on the assumption that all appup software would be signed, and unsigned code would simply not run16:28
lbtnot AIUI16:28
ali12341ie the only way to get software is to buy from appup16:28
lbtbut the argument was surely about you selling my code on appup16:28
lbteven if you get my code from gitorious I think you should not be allowed to do that16:29
lbtunless I agree16:29
*** Venemo has quit IRC16:30
berndhsif the original artist is easily identifiable, what' stopping you from asking him/her ?16:30
lbt100% agree16:30
ali12341fair enough, unless appup is the only way to obtain the software, then it's wrong16:30
lbton some devices... it will be16:30
lbtmmm16:31
lbtI should say... on some devices the user will not have any other clear way to install SW16:31
*** Venemo has joined #meego16:31
lbtand MeeGo security policy may not permit the user to install SW16:31
ali12341RMS is very clear that the GPL is designed to prevent a single developer from sitting on their software and not improving it, and also preventing anyone else from improving it16:32
lbtthat's not part of this debate16:32
lbtand incedentally nor is GPL316:32
ali12341oh but it is16:32
lbtnot unless my SW is GPL316:32
ali12341because by going to appstore route you;ve found yet another loophole16:32
Venemoali12341, wut? what's wrong with the GPL?16:32
lbtGPL316:32
lbtvs 216:32
ali12341Venemo: read the scrollback16:33
Venemo[15:32] <ali12341> RMS is very clear that the GPL is designed to prevent a single developer from sitting on their software and not improving it, and also preventing anyone else from improving it16:33
Venemowhy would it prevent you from improving ti?16:33
VenemoI don't get it?16:33
ali12341Venemo: you;re reading it wrong16:33
w00t_the key word is "from sitting on it and not improving it"16:33
lbtand it doesn't16:33
ali12341Venemo: the GPL is designed to stop the developer from preventing others from improving the software16:33
w00t_someone else can pick it up and do what they want with it16:33
ali12341w00t_: yes exactly. except that they can't sell it on appup at least under the theoretical system we were discussing16:34
lbthowever, my proposal is that AppUp should give copyright holders priority for distributing OSS code via AppUp16:34
alteregoIs there something wrong with community obs?16:34
lbtand if the holder doesn't accept your changes16:34
lbtalterego: nope16:34
alteregoI'm getting basic auto failures.16:35
lbtoh16:35
*** phl0x81 has joined #meego16:35
lbtsry16:35
w00t_lol16:35
lbtmaybe16:35
Venemoyeah, that's right16:35
alteregos/auto/auth/16:35
Venemomhm16:35
berndhsi'm getting basic auth failures on pub.OBS too16:35
berndhsI dont think its personal16:35
alteregoIs there a way to perform an osc chroot without having it talk to the obs? :)16:35
alteregoAh, -o16:35
berndhsi can't log in to build.pub.meego.com either16:36
lbtlooking16:36
lbthold the debate ;)16:37
alterego:)16:37
timoph:)16:37
* timoph presses pause16:37
*** MoRpHeUz has quit IRC16:38
lbttry now...16:40
alteregoNo luck16:40
lbtearthling?16:40
alteregoHrm? :)16:41
alteregoMy username?16:41
lbtyeah16:41
alteregotswindell16:41
lbtI see that username16:41
berndhssame thing for me "earthling"16:41
*** e-yes has joined #meego16:41
lbtmmm16:41
lbtyep. see you16:41
berndhsmy home: repo is there16:42
timophhmmh. fails for me too16:42
*** naquad has quit IRC16:42
*** Shanita has quit IRC16:45
*** Kaskuka has joined #meego16:45
*** naquad has joined #meego16:47
lbtgood news... the list of obscommunity users isn't blank16:48
*** mtux has quit IRC16:48
*** mtux has joined #meego16:48
Stskeepsthe bad news?16:48
lbtthe bad news is I haven't found the bad news16:48
*** gbraad has quit IRC16:49
*** merlin1991 has quit IRC16:50
*** merlin1991 has joined #meego16:50
*** gbraad has joined #meego16:50
*** gbraad has joined #meego16:50
*** peisanen has joined #meego16:55
lbtmore good news tlaukkanen can login16:59
lbtbad news ... only he can login16:59
*** gaveen_ has joined #meego17:00
berndhsah lets blame him17:01
*** gaveen has quit IRC17:03
*** jukkaeklund has joined #meego17:03
alteregoHahah17:05
*** jmorgan has joined #meego17:11
*** bboyvat__ has quit IRC17:14
*** bboyvat has joined #meego17:14
*** ksinny_ has joined #meego17:15
*** ksinny has quit IRC17:16
lbtany openldap people? the memberof seems to need regenerating17:19
lcukali12341, lbt - what if there was a license which had the same freedoms as the GPL, but with a section dealing with monetised app stores specifically and ensuring that contribution breakdown based on participation were "to best possible" split fairly.  so the same app could have contributions towards debian even (which might be 1 or 2% of total code size) and when published on ovi or appup the proceedings were shared.  it encourages people to l17:27
lcukook at diversifying where apps are made and ensures people get what a fair chance of income for participation17:27
ali12341the GPL has never been about guaranteeing income from selling software17:28
*** NIN101 has joined #meego17:28
lcukI know17:28
lcukbut it is also not dealing with paid distribution17:28
berndhsthe GPL also isn't about garuanteeing software at no cost17:29
ali12341berndhs: the GPL is designed to guarantee that the maximum cost of a piece of software is equal to the cost of your time spent extending an existing piece of GPL software to do what you want17:29
ali12341as opposed to classic proprietary licences which are designed to guarantee the minimum cost is whatever the market will pay17:30
berndhscopying something and then selling it is not "extending"17:30
ali12341correct, if you do not need to extend the software to do what you want, then the maximum cost will be 017:31
ali12341if you decide to pay more that's your choice17:31
berndhsbut this is about teh app store17:31
berndhsright ?17:31
ali12341the method of distribution is irrelevant17:31
lcukno berndhs - this is about any distribution method17:31
lcukwhich may also be on the cover of a magazine17:32
lcukor included with device17:32
berndhsI though it was a debate about one specific app store17:32
lcuki hope not, otherwise we will have the same discussion next week17:32
lcukand that will get boring17:32
berndhswhere that app store would give preference to the original copyright holders17:32
ali12341it's a debate about a method of circumventing the GPL by making an agreement with a third party17:33
lcuktechnically it would be nice to offer a breakdown of participation along with each OSS app in a store17:33
lcukand allow deriviates and stuff too17:33
lcukbut still using the various contributions17:33
berndhsmy point is this : if Alice has some packages in pub.meego.com, and Bob decides to seell Alices meego pacakges17:34
berndhsthen Bob should ask ALice first and propose a fair deal17:34
lcukali12341, why circumvent it?  distribution on debian stable is the same17:34
ali12341not according to the GPL17:34
lcukjust monetary value == 017:34
ali12341according to the GPL alice has no right to prevent bob17:34
lcukwho wants to prevent it?17:35
berndhsyeah but Bob is an asshole in this scenario17:35
ali12341alice must beat bob by innovating and producing improvements to the code faster than bob can rip them off17:35
ali12341this is by design in order to ensure innovation keeps happening17:35
berndhsor Alice can hire poeple to beat up Bob :)17:35
lcukyes, but if the app store already could look at the git history of the package in question17:35
ali12341nobody disputes that bob is an asshole17:35
berndhsBob isn't after innovation, Bob is after a quick buck17:35
ali12341which is why bob will ultimately fail when everyone realises his products are crap17:35
lcukand be able to happily perform the cake cutting17:35
ali12341but all this is irrelevent17:36
jonnorno, "his product" might be amazing because of all the hard work the author does17:36
ali12341it won't be as good as the author's version17:36
jonnorwhy not?17:36
berndhsit will be the same as the authors version17:36
ali12341because the author will continue to innovate17:36
jonnorand Bob will update his package17:36
jonnorupdating a package will take less time and effort than innovating17:37
berndhsBob's innovation will be to offer it for $0.99 while Alice wants $1.0117:37
lcukwell if the app store could see the history of both apps, alice and bob can both have their apps from same common core17:37
lcukand everyone is happy17:37
ali12341you'll get updates from alice before you get them from bob17:37
lcukbecause the contributions and hence store payments will be balanced17:37
*** Venemo has quit IRC17:37
*** jukkaeklund has left #meego17:37
ali12341yes, the GPL does not guarantee you the right to dictate the price of your software17:37
berndhswhy should the app store support copying and re-labellling ?17:38
berndhsif Bob wants to copy, he should say that this is what he is doing17:38
lbtlcuk: it is about AppUp, not distribution in general17:38
ali12341berndhs: yes, trademarks are the correct way to handle that17:39
lbtberndhs: I think you and I are on the same wavelength here17:39
ali12341berndhs: under the proposed solution "only the copyright holder can upload" it is possible for alice to block bob's software even if bob has made significant improvements to it17:39
berndhswhy specifically trademark ? why not the store ?17:39
lbtali12341: yes indeed it is possible for alice to block bob17:39
lbtmakes sense17:39
berndhsmaybe, but you are proposing that a simple copy can be uploaded17:40
ali12341it makes sense if you want to have no competition17:40
ali12341ie you are alice17:40
lbtand it's not "only the copyright holder" it is (maybe) "copyright holder can veto"17:40
ali12341that's the same thing17:40
lbtROFL17:40
lbttoo right I want no competition17:40
ali12341if you assume that copyright holders will always veto17:40
lbtwhat gives you the right to upload my code to AppUp ?17:41
jonnorwhich does not seem like a resonable assumption17:41
ali12341lbt: the fact that you released it as GPL17:41
berndhsI say if you want to make money off other people's work, you should give them a share17:41
lbtno..17:41
timophonce someone starts selling something that I've written and giving away free I'm changing to more restrictive license17:41
lbtthat gives you the right to ask AppUp17:41
ali12341lbt, berndhs: then you should not release your code as GPL17:41
lbtthey don't have to do what you say17:41
lbtbullshit17:41
lbtyou can take my code and sell it17:42
ali12341lbt: likewise, appup do not have to do what alice says, ie alice should not get a veto17:42
thiagotimoph: if you use something more restrictive than the GPL, you have to stop using other people's GPL code17:42
lbtbut me and appup ... we agreed to partner on this17:42
timophthiago: yep. I know17:42
*** phinaliumz has joined #meego17:42
lbtand nothing gives you the right to force Bob to take your code to the streetcorner and hawk it17:42
lbtsure you can ask Bill17:43
thiagoand it still doesn't stop the redistributing of the older code17:43
thiagobesides, the GPL still forces the transferring of all rights17:43
lbtthiago: big backlogk17:43
lbtthe point is for me and Appup to have an agreement17:43
lbtas copyright holder they will respect my work17:43
berndhsif you let Bob copy everyone's code and sell it for less, you ensure that the original authors stop working17:44
lbtand if someone turns up with my code17:44
timophyeah. the ability just to package and sell GPL stuff in an app store just sounds wrong17:44
lbtand tries to distribute via appup they'll say "sure"17:44
ali12341berndhs: that's the same argument that every anti-GPL troll makes at every lecture RMS ever gives17:44
lbtbut if I then say "hey, please stop"17:44
lbtthey will17:44
lbtali12341: no, it's not17:44
lbtthis is nothing to do with GPL17:44
lbtyou can take my code and sell it17:44
berndhsI'm not anti-GPL I'm anti plagiarism17:44
lbtplease do17:44
timophmaybe a better approach would be to submit the same app to the store and ask nothing for it17:45
lbtbut ali12341.... nothing stops me from going to your business partner and saying "hey, you know I wrote that code. Fancy working with me?17:45
ali12341lbt: correct17:45
lbtali12341: and that's what I'm preemptively doing with appup17:45
jonnortimoph: why should the original copyright holder have to fight (marketing wise) against the one just exploiting the work?17:46
ali12341lbt: no, what you are doing is using a third party agreement to prevent people from approaching your customers and offering the same service for less money17:46
Ans5iin the meego tablet image there is no webgl in the browser, is it coming at some point?17:46
lcukwhy is it about exploiting?  as long as credits get back to authors it should be possible to have 1000 variations of same open code on the store17:47
ali12341lbt: so the appup thing is the exact opposite of the example you gave17:47
jonnorlcuk: I don't quite see what the benefit of that would be17:47
lcukjonnor, how many fart apps are there on certain stores?17:47
lcuksupposing someone wrote the most awesome fart generator17:48
timophwell. not that I've thought about it more than 2 secs.. When I'm licensing my stuff with GPL, I'm also giving permission to sell it if someone really wants to pay for OSS17:48
timophnot/now17:48
jonnorlcuk: and what is the value of that?17:48
thiagoyou're giving those options, yes17:48
lcukjonnor, what is the disadvantage in that?17:48
lcuk1000 apps == 1000 people marketing apps in their own way to their own set of friends17:49
timophIMO selling something that anyone can package won't be a long term business17:49
ali12341exactly17:49
*** Armi^ has quit IRC17:49
*** m1ght3th0r has quit IRC17:49
jonnorlcuk: it becomes harder to find the best fart app.17:49
jonnorlcuk: or indeed, a good one17:49
ali12341point being17:49
lcukso?17:49
lcuktry a few :)17:50
lcuki see hundreds of same products when I go to supermarket17:50
ali12341it might be perfectly legal to have an agreement with appup to limit how your competitors can use your GPL code17:50
lbtali12341: yes I am indeed "using a third party agreement to prevent people from approaching your customers and offering the same service for less money"17:50
ali12341but it is completely opposite to the spirit of the GPL17:50
ali12341so if you want to do this, why use GPL code?17:50
lbtbullshit17:50
ali12341unless you are using *someone elses GPL code* rather than rewrite it yourself17:50
lbtyou seem to think that GPL has something to do with money17:50
ali12341in which case, pot, meet kettle17:50
lbtit doesn't17:50
*** puffin has quit IRC17:51
jonnorlcuk: having to try hundreds of products to find the appropriate one does not seem like an advantage to me.17:51
lbtGPL != $$$17:51
lbtGPL == right to redistribute and change17:51
ali12341lbt: the GPL is designed to prevent companies from holding a monopoly on the supply of software17:51
lbtno it's not17:51
*** loft306 has quit IRC17:51
lbtit's designed to encourage redist and freedom17:51
*** Armi^ has joined #meego17:51
* lcuk vanishes to more birthday stuff17:51
lbto/17:51
timophlcuk: have fun17:52
lcukgetting used to being offline more, shall be on in more balanced sessions \o17:52
ali12341i'm not sure why you think this has anything to do with money, since you are the only one who is trying to protect a revenue stream17:52
ali12341by blocking people from giving away the thing you are trying to make artificially scarce through third party agreements17:52
*** MacDrunk has joined #meego17:52
berndhsali12341: you're saying if Alice uses the GPL, the only party with no rights is Alice17:53
jonnorali12341: why would one want to enable people that to little to no work to give away software that other people wrote?17:53
ali12341alice has the same rights as everyone else17:53
berndhsBob has rights, end users have rights, but not the original author17:53
timophwell the orinal author has to rights too17:54
MyrttiI wonder how much effort does it require for me to understand qt enough to make even a rudimentary app for reading project gutenberg stuff on the exopc17:54
timophplus he's the copyright holder and has given up some of his claims on the code by lisencing it as GPL17:54
dm8tbrMyrtti: I'm pretty green on this stuff too, but my understanding is that QML makes it very easy17:55
*** MacDrunk has quit IRC17:55
berndhsAlice hasn't given uo anything, ALice has granted rights to others17:55
MyrttiI've studied it a bit but I'm far from being proficient enough to invent something "new"17:55
thiagothe copyright holder is the one with most rights17:56
timophsame thing written differently IMO17:56
GeneralAntillestimoph: which can be reversed as soon as he releases the next version.17:56
GeneralAntillesGPL isn't giving up copyright.17:56
lbtI'm trying to fix ldap so not paying full attention17:56
ali12341if you chose not to use GPL you may do whatever you want of course17:56
timophyeah. poor choice in wording. I could explain this in finnish so it would make more sense :p17:56
*** andyross has joined #meego17:56
lbtMyrtti: Qt Creator?17:57
lbtali12341: now *that* is evil17:57
Myrttilbt: yup17:57
lbtMyrtti: I'lll let you know soon... I'm working on an e2e install->Apps17:57
lbt(ie QtCreator/SDK install)17:57
Myrttilbt: I had it installed in January and it was in working condition then, but since I've gotten a new computer with new Ubuntu and my brain has gone into mush with personal/family/work issues17:58
ali12341the thing i don't understand is, you seem to have a philosophical belief that you should be allowed to veto others from selling your GPL'd software17:58
lbtali12341: no17:58
lbtI never said that17:58
ali12341what did you say then?17:58
*** kimitake_idle is now known as kimitake17:59
lbtI said that the Intel AppUp store should have a policy that allows copyright holders to 'veto' the selling of their code.17:59
lbtthis is not me, this is AppUp17:59
ali12341lbt: why do you think that?17:59
ali12341is it because you believe that developers want it?17:59
lbtBecause then I will a) get revenue, b) release GPL code17:59
ali12341if so, why do you believe that? is it because you yourself want that veto?17:59
lbtyes18:00
ali12341so in fact, you do want that veto18:00
thiagolbt: I don't think the AppUp can do that18:00
lbtnote that *you* do not have to implement that18:00
lbtthiago: yes.18:00
alteregoI don't think it's a good idea either :D18:00
thiagoanyone could download a GPL app for free and re-upload it for paying money18:00
ali12341so if you think appupp should do it, do you think that all appstores should do it?18:00
thiagoit's completely legal18:00
alteregoIf someone comes along and does a better job than you, and is using your code. I'd probably prefer to pay them :P18:00
lbtthiago: they can say "if the copyright holder of an app asks another user not to distribute that app then they will respect the holder's wishes"18:01
Jaffalbt: Isn't that exactly what happened with VLC and Apple's App Store?18:01
lbtalterego: you can18:01
lbtJaffa: yes18:01
lbtand the kernel18:01
thiagowhat if they modify the app and re-upload it?18:01
thiagosubstantial new modification18:01
ali12341i'm not talking about technicalities of what is allowed, i am talking about philosophy18:01
lbtthiago: then I get veto rights18:01
lbtbut not the right to upload their mods18:02
lbtbut if we split it...18:02
lbtthen that's fine18:02
thiagothat's also thinking that you can't link to a GPL library and sell for money18:02
thiagoyou'd have to get the permission of all copyright holders18:02
lbtdifferent18:02
ali12341lbt: so if you think appup should do it, do you think that all appstores should do it?18:02
*** andyross has quit IRC18:02
lbtthiago: compliance18:02
thiagolbt: no, it's technically the same18:02
thiagoit has nothing to do with the compliance18:02
lbtdoes18:03
thiagothere are no GPL libraries in the compliancy18:03
lbtappup are not sharing meego18:03
thiagoso if you're using a GPL library, it's a private lib18:03
*** sjg156 has quit IRC18:03
lbtI can't statically link a GPL lib... no18:03
lbtwell I can18:03
lbtbut if the holder asks me to stop, I must18:03
thiagothey holder cannot force you18:03
lbtno18:04
thiagothey gave you the right to do it and cannot take it back18:04
lbtnot me18:04
lbtappup18:04
MyrttiI think you all need more cheesecake18:04
*** andyross has joined #meego18:04
lbtit's a policy18:04
lbtnot a law18:04
thiagoyes, appup could do it18:04
thiagobut I'm trying to point out that this gets hairy very quickly18:04
lbtactually compliance makes it easy for most 1-man apps18:04
lbtthe only code being distributed is usually single-holder18:04
lbtfor say, QML apps18:05
lbtand this allows GPL apps via the appstore18:05
lbtand provides $$$18:05
lbtthey're still free via MeeGo OBS18:05
lbtand they can still be shared18:05
lbtand onwards anything goes18:05
lbtbut AppUp *policy* is to work with the c. holder18:06
lbtso if someone uploads the 100% C.lbt shopper app and sells it for $0 vs my $518:06
lbtand I say please don't18:06
lbtthen the end user has to get my app via some other means18:07
lbteg c.obs, google, github18:07
lbtbut.... the Dixons user will probably give me $518:07
thiagothe problem is when the copyright split is quite complex18:07
lbtindeed18:07
thiagosuppose you use a 100k-line GPL library18:07
lbtstatic?18:07
thiagoand you have 5k lines of your own app18:07
thiagostatic or private shared18:07
lbt(OK) then any one of the holders can object18:08
thiagoyou're responsible for just less than 5% of the copyright18:08
berndhsthat's why you use only LGPL libraries18:08
thiagoshould the app up contact each and every copyright holder in the library?18:08
lbtberndhs: same deal for LGPL18:08
lbtthiago: no18:08
ali12341the licence used is irrelevant if any copyright holder has a veto18:08
lbtthis is reactive18:08
dm8tbrmhhhh, cheesecake...18:08
lbtnot proactive18:08
Jaffathiago: I think it's reactive to veto request.18:08
lbtyep ... "hey, that's my shopper app.... stop giving it away"18:09
Jaffathiago: i.e. any (c) owner can assert "that's my code, please don't be selling it"18:09
thiagoappup could do that18:09
ali12341i still don't understand why you released it under the GPL if it's 100% your own work and you want to impose additional restrictions18:09
lbtand, tbh I think that you should declare "all my code"18:09
lbtwhere "my" may == "our"18:10
lbtnot sure about that18:10
JaffaThis is, almost certainly, going to be the policy of all app stores anyway. The source code licensing will play very little part.18:10
lbtI think it's fascinating ... could really enable a $$ model for true GPL code18:11
lbtwhere geeks win and end-users who learn about freedom win18:11
lbtand end users see value in service18:11
ali12341as long as they don't want the freedom of competing with the original author of the software lol18:11
timophIMO the best policy would be: if it's OSS then it costs 0. otherwise it will just cause bad blood18:12
lbtthey can compete ali1234118:12
lbtreally18:12
ali12341no they can't18:12
*** srag has quit IRC18:12
lbtyes they can18:12
ali12341because you want the right of veto in any store you are selling in18:12
lcuklbt, but unless the contribution breakdown is included and usable then peripheral contributions which go to support and help the main app (for instance a porting effort to new platform)18:12
lbtthey just can't use the original author's code to compete...18:12
lbtthat's not competition18:12
ali12341therefore by definition they cannot compete18:12
lcukwould not be supportable18:12
lbtthey can give it away18:12
ali12341but not anywhere where you are selling it18:13
lbtthey can start a political party saying how all the world should just get rid of money...18:13
berndhsteh current economic model sucks for small developers, its not sustainable18:13
* timoph needs cheesecake18:13
lbtali12341: they can't leech... sorry18:13
lbtlcuk: there was talk at AppUp of 'components'18:13
lcuklbt, but they can help to make the app better18:13
lbtand providing a model to reimburse libs18:13
lcuklbt, it is not even as far as components18:14
lcukconsider someone making debian packaging18:14
lcukfor your shopper18:14
lbtyep18:14
lcukso then your app is not only available in appup18:14
lcukbut also on debian18:14
lbtsure18:14
lbtfor 100% free18:14
ali12341should debian respect vetos from copyright holders?18:14
*** srag has joined #meego18:14
lbtali12341: is that their policy?18:14
lcukit would be nice to allow some fraction of revenue to go towards them18:14
lbtI think not18:14
thiagoit's not a veto if it's optional18:14
lbtlcuk: no, not at all18:14
thiagoit's just a suggestion18:14
ali12341say you package your app for debian but do a really crap job, then someone else comes along and packages it doing a much better job... you would then be allowed to veto them just out of spite18:15
ali12341lbt: i'm not asking about anyone's "policy" but your own18:15
lbtthiago: this is AppUp. It's not optional18:15
lcuklbt, no one person can do everything!18:15
lbtlcuk: this isn't about debian18:15
lcuksure18:15
lbtit's about MeeGo18:15
lbtnow18:15
* thiago was answering about Debian, but yeah18:15
lcukwell whn a new view on shopper is offered as a patch18:16
lbtif a packager packages my app for AppUp and comes to me and says "80/20, you/me" ... I may say "sure"18:16
lcukor someone writes documentation18:16
lbtlcuk: yep... now that's interesting18:16
jonnorlcuk: that stuff should go upstream18:16
lbtdoes that mean that I need copyright assignment for patches to my app?18:16
lcukwell the way you are talking, yes18:17
lbtep18:17
lbtI agree18:17
lbtlets be clear here....18:17
lcukbut the way I am talking, it would not matter - the collective pool would grow18:17
ali12341i agree too18:17
lbtI release my code under GPL18:17
ali12341otherwise a competitor can stealthily submit a patch then veto your app later on just to piss you off18:17
lbtali12341: ye18:17
lbts18:17
lbtso again... AppUp policy comes into play18:17
ali12341thing is i can understand why you want it to work this way18:18
lbtthey may say "can't be arsed ... no money for $$$ code"18:18
ali12341what i can't understand is why you release your code as GPL18:18
*** merlin1991 has quit IRC18:18
lbtali12341: WHAT?18:18
lbtbecause I like GPL18:18
lbtit's good18:18
*** merlin1991 has joined #meego18:18
lbtand it's *NOT ABOUT MONEY*18:18
ali12341but you want to impose additional restrictions18:18
lbtno I don't18:18
ali12341so you don't want a veto?18:18
lbtyour arguments are wrong18:19
ali12341you have failed to demonstrate that18:19
lbtAppUp policy is not a restriction18:19
jonnorif you have a veto, you can impose additional restrictions18:19
jonnorsure it is18:19
lbtno you can't18:19
RST38hAh, another OSS/GPL argument!18:19
lbtno18:19
ali12341RST38h: this isn't the usual one though lol18:19
lbtif me and a friend decide to do something... you can't make my friend do the same for you18:19
lbthe doesn't like you18:20
timophyeah but ali12341 has a point there. IMO that kind model conflicts with GPL's idea18:20
lbthe thinks you don't contribute to the ecosystem18:20
lbtand thinks you'll make me sad18:20
lbtso he doesn't play with you18:20
lbtthis is not a restriction18:20
lbtit's your personality18:20
lbtyou leech18:20
ali12341lbt: following the letter of the GPL but not the philosophy and then claiming the high ground is disingenuous18:20
lbtthis does not make us all better18:20
JartzaOk. I gave my vote. Done my part.18:20
RST38hali: So what is it about?18:20
ali12341RST38h: it's about whether making an agreement with a third party to add additional restrictions on the use of your "GPL" code18:21
lbtRST38h: I think AppUp should allow copyright holders to veto the "sale" of their apps by other users18:21
jonnorlbt: That is not quite the case here. If your friend is appup, this would be you asking him to not play with the other guy18:21
jonnorbecause he is a leech18:21
lbtyes jonnor18:21
lbtbecause appup wants to encourage creativity, not mindless copying18:22
RST38hali: Not possible, violates GPL, end of story.18:22
jonnorthat is you and your friend imposing a restriction18:22
RST38hlbt: And it does allow that?18:22
lbtRST38h: it may18:22
lbtit's not violating GPL18:22
RST38hlbt: And has anyone contacted Intel Legal?18:22
lbtRST38h: I will18:22
lbtwe spoke to Appup at Summit18:22
ali12341RST38h: yeah we're not discussing whether it is technically allowed or not, we're discussion the philosophical implications. at least i am...18:23
RST38hlbt: Ah, wait, you are selling your GPLed app and are pissed off about somebody doing the same?18:23
lbtyes18:23
lbtcareful of words18:23
thiagolots of appup people coming to the conference18:23
RST38hali: Because it is not allowed by the GPL, it should not happen and has no phhilosophical implications.18:23
lbtI am working with Intel to distribute my app to users. They pay for the medium.18:23
RST38hlbt: Ok, then you are the idiot, and those guys are right18:23
*** lolloo has quit IRC18:23
lbtRST38h: nope... sorry18:23
ali12341*facepalm*18:23
jonnorRST38h: well, it has philosophical implications :p they would just be void18:23
RST38hYes, lbt. Do you want an explanation?18:24
lbtyes18:24
ali12341my point is and has always been that regardless of technicalities, using such an agreement would go against the spirit of the GPL, so why use the GPL in the first palce?18:25
RST38hlbt: When you GPL your app, you automatically (see GPL) allow anyone who gets it to do whatever they wish to it (including commercial redistribution) ad long as a bunch of conditions are met18:25
lbtPlease note that a) app is GPL. b) user is free to distribute and sell it anywhere they like. c) AppUp has a policy to deal with holders.18:25
RST38hlbt: Now, among other things, these guys may also decide to resell it.18:25
lbtthey can18:26
lbtI'm happy18:26
lbtthey can make CDs with it ... anything18:26
RST38hlbt: AppUp cannot refuse them to do it in this case, because these guys are not violating anything18:26
*** Termana has quit IRC18:26
timophbut you're not happy if they give it away for free?18:26
jonnorali12341: you want to encourage people to write free software though. If you make it beneficial to not free your software (because it will be much harder to get any revenue), less people will likely create free software18:26
jonnorali12341: that seems like something we would want to try to fight, right?18:26
lbtRST38h: AppUp are not obliged by any law to deal with any given party18:26
RST38hlbt: Including you, mind you18:27
lbtRST38h: check the debate18:27
lbtyes18:27
ali12341jonnor: what's your point?18:27
RST38hlbt: So, however pissed you are, AppUp is well within their rights here18:27
lbtAppUp are essentially charging to deliver the GPL SW. (like FSF used to do)18:27
lbtRST38h: wait18:27
RST38hlbt: BTW, same stuff occurs on Android Store all the time AFAIK18:27
lbtyou think I want to stop Appup18:27
lbtI don't18:28
RST38hok,so what do you want?18:28
lbtI want AppUp to make a policy statement18:28
RST38hok, of what kind?18:28
lbtask me what and why18:28
ssvblbt: why don't you use some other open source license for your app? why even involving GPL here?18:28
RST38hlbt: What policy statement?18:28
lbt"If the copyright holder of an app asks us not to distribute. We will respect their moral right"18:29
lbtssvb: GPL rules18:29
ali12341even if the copyright holder has chosen not to sell their app in appup?18:29
lbtnb... see Linus and kernel18:29
ssvblbt: effectively you just need a modified GPL with additional clause18:29
lbtssvb: no not at all18:29
lbtbad idea18:29
RST38hlbt: Ok. Because you GPLed your app, they have a right to distribute.18:30
lbtyou may sell my code18:30
lbtyes, they have the right18:30
RST38hlbt: And you gave them that right yourself.18:30
lbtnot the obligation18:30
lbtyes, I did18:30
lbtnot only that18:30
ssvblbt: but the other standard GPL license users should not be hurt by you, that would just suck18:30
RST38hSo, what are you complaining about?18:30
lbtwhen they sell my app to a user I *oblige* them to make the src available18:30
RST38hIf you really want to control your app distribution, DO NOT GPL IT18:30
lbtno18:30
lbtwrong18:30
ali12341RST38h: apparently he has a "moral right" to veto anyone from profiting from his code (or even giving it away)18:30
RST38hIf you GPL it, do not complain18:30
lbtI simply deal wihth the distributor18:30
RST38hali:This contradicts GPL.18:31
ali12341RST38h: maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. IANAL. but it certainly is against the philosophy of the GPL18:31
RST38hali: It really contradicts GPL, sorry18:31
lbtRST38h: you have a brain ... pay attention18:31
RST38hali: even IANAL can tell you that after reading GPL18:31
lbtI am not preventing anything18:32
RST38hlbt: Ok. So, AppUp is distributing your app. Do they make the source code available too?18:32
lbtyes18:32
lbtof course18:32
RST38hlbt: then they are within GPL18:32
lbtyes18:32
RST38hlbt: Once again: what makes you think you can veto redistribution by them?18:32
lbtplease listen18:32
RST38hlistening18:33
lbtI do not want to veto redistribution by AppUp18:33
lbtI want AppUp to veto redistribution by AppUp18:33
jonnoron your request?18:34
RST38h*facepalm*18:34
lbtThey say to me "what do you think lbt?"18:34
*** DocScrutinizer has joined #meego18:34
lbtI say ... no18:34
lbtthey say "ok"18:34
lbtthis is not me "demanding"18:34
RST38hAnd they say, "well, it is GPLed, so we distribute it anyway"18:34
lbtI have no such right18:34
lbtyep18:34
lbtwait18:34
RST38hYou want them to listen to you?18:34
lbtnow...18:34
lbtyes18:34
lbtask why18:34
RST38hGood luck with that.18:34
GAN900I'd say you picked the wrong license. :)18:34
lbtnope18:34
*** ksinny_ has quit IRC18:34
RST38hIt does not matter "why", really.18:34
lbtI spoke to them all weekend18:34
ssvblbt: now listen to me :)18:35
lbtyou guys think this is a license issue18:35
lbtit's not18:35
Myrtticheesecake18:35
lbtit is nothing to do with that18:35
timophMyrtti: hmmh :p~18:35
lbtit is to do with encouraging the MeeGo ecosystem18:35
lbthow?18:35
GAN900How does AppUp decide it's your code?18:35
lbtby working with GPL developers18:35
lbtGAN900: good question ... lets assume that it has a copyright on it18:36
alteregoYay!18:36
timophMyrtti: btw, did you try areena on full screen. flash crashes in full screen for me18:36
lbtAppUp are very keen to encourage us18:36
lbtthey want to find ways... they are literally paying us money to make apps18:37
ssvblbt: I'm participating in development of one free software application (a game) and might want to publish it on some app stores some time later, I may want to abandon this activity any time and pass it to somebody else, and I surely do *not* want anyone to bother me asking for any special permissions to do this18:37
alteregoI've not built locally using osc build: meego-handset-dialer-0.1.19-2.armv7hl.rpm18:37
alterego:D18:37
lbtssvb: that's fine18:37
RST38hlbt: I think it is like encouraging toads to fly18:37
alteregos/not/now/18:37
RST38hlbt: No matter how much you do it, toads will not fly. And the GPLed sodftware will notmake you money.18:37
lbtRST38h: wrong18:37
lbtit's making me plenty thanks18:37
RST38hlbt: YOu want to encourage the "ecosystem"? Allow people to profit from their work.18:37
lbtRST38h: you don't grok GPL economics....18:38
RST38hActually, I probably do it better than somepeople here :)18:38
lbttrue18:38
ssvblbt: It's not fine for me! Moreover, I may be hit by a bus tomorrow, and in this case the development of this application has a risk of be deadlocked. I want to ensure that this will not happen and GPL license protects my rights here.18:38
lbtssvb: it will18:38
jonnorRST38h: that seems to be what lbt is trying to do18:38
ssvblbt: and you want to take this right from me18:39
RST38hThe only way to profit from a GPL product is to take it from someone else and resell18:39
lbtssvb: god no18:39
lbtRST38h: bullshit18:39
jonnorRST38h: what? what is the logic?18:39
RST38hAdding legal protections / services / support / etc18:39
RST38hlbt: Really? Look at any successful GPL company. Like Redhat ;)18:39
lbt" take it from someone else "18:39
RST38hjonnor: The logic is simple18:39
ssvbRST38h: the only way to profit from GPL application is to provide a good paid (or donations based) support18:40
jonnorRST38h: RedHat writes huge amount of their product themselves (not everything, or even the majority, but still)18:40
RST38hjonnor: If you spend money on GPL development, someone else can always take the result of your work and create an identical company minus the money spent on development18:40
lbtssvb: what I'm saying is that if your game turns up on the appstore and you don't want it there... you ask them to take it down18:40
RST38hssvb: Really?18:40
*** jophish has quit IRC18:40
lbtif you *do* want it there... or don't care... do nothing18:40
RST38hssvb: What will prohibit someone else from taking your stuff and providing even better support for it?18:40
RST38hssvb: And I do not even want to start on donations :)18:41
Myrttitimoph: yup, same thing18:41
lbtRST38h you are now arguing about GPL vs proprietary18:41
lbtfeel free18:41
jonnorRST38h: a typical effect of doing the development is that you gain (as a sideeffect) the competence to do support18:41
ssvbRST38h: well, that's a jungle law here, survival for the fittest :)18:41
lbtthat's not something I care about18:41
Myrttibut I guess it's a thing of count your blessings. atleast there IS flash18:41
RST38hlbt: All I am saying is that "GPL economy" is an oxymoron.18:41
jonnorI would say that this is a core part of why RedHat is succesfull18:41
* lbt looks at his Jaguar18:41
ssvbRST38h: if I were afraid of this, then I would not use GPL in the first place18:41
ali12341jonnor: yeah that's why they are not releasing their kernel patches to make it harder for their competitors18:42
RST38hssvb: And you just handicapped yourself by investing into a project that can be reused by nyone else at 0 cost18:42
jonnorali12341: their kernel patches are released, just in a slightly less convenient way than before18:42
ali12341sorry, of course they release them, just not as a proper patch series18:42
jonnoror well, they don't release the individual patches as such, but the end-result18:42
ali12341but you know what i mean18:43
lbtjonnor: indeed .... this is simply an anti-leech mechanism18:43
ssvbRST38h: not really, that's a hobby project :) more like GPL is perfect when abandoning something, and I would not want the people who could potentially pick it up to have any problems18:43
RST38hssvb: I think you are drifting off topic here18:43
ssvband if a certain app store enforces some weird policy, that would be a problem18:43
lbtexcept it draws power (probably too much) from Intel's control of AppUp18:43
lbtssvb: weird?18:43
jonnorali12341: yes, I know. They would probably be successfull without it as well though (just less so), so it does not make my point invalid18:43
ssvbRST38h: not really, I'm just protecting my rights here :)18:43
*** Evanescence has quit IRC18:44
ali12341regardless of whether the GPL economy works, and regardless of whether any of these "anti-leech" measures works or is allowable, it's all against the philosophy of the GPL18:44
ali12341so why even bother?18:44
RST38hAstronauts on long space missions may not be able to take paracetamol to treat a headache or antibiotics to fight infection, a study has found.18:44
RST38hHm18:44
*** arvind_k has joined #meego18:44
lbtno it isn't18:44
ali12341if you don't believe in the philosophy, why use it?18:45
lbtFSF used to sell tapes with GPL code18:45
RST38hForget that damn philosophy thing. It is against the letter of the GPL18:45
lbtno it isn't18:45
ali12341lbt: did they also have an agreement with the USPO not to ship tapes from anyone else?18:45
lbtnothing in the GPL obliges me and my mate to sell your code RST38h18:45
RST38hSo, you either GPL your stuff and sit tight, or you release it under the license that says "I retain the right to veto redistribution:18:45
lbtali12341: no and nothing stopped them18:45
jonnorRST38h: it is maybe not if appUp is the one denying redistribution (and not the copyright holder)?18:46
RST38hlbt:First of all, I do not GPL code.18:46
ali12341lbt: nothing stopped them except that it would be completely against their entire philosophy18:46
lbtRST38h: no license18:46
lbtali12341: not really18:46
jonnorI mean, appUp is under no obligation to redistribute something simply because it is GPL18:46
lbtthey did do that18:46
RST38hlbt:Secondly, GPL does not oblige, it allows in this case18:46
lbtali12341: they did have an agreement with their carrier that no-one else could use the carrier18:46
RST38hlbt: And I do not think AppUp guys have the same goals as yourself either18:46
ali12341lbt: i want to knwo more about this18:46
ssvblbt: You just have selected the wrong license. Don't try to poison appup with some additional restrictions, which are even not compatible with GPL and can cause problems for other people18:47
lbtthe FSF paid a person to make the tapes. During office hours that person wan't allowed to make and sell tapes for other people.18:47
RST38hlbt: Their main goal at the moment is most likely to pool as many apps as possible in their store to insure positive progress reports on the AppUp project18:47
lbtRST38h: and?18:47
RST38hlbt: And, everyone gets awarded, patted on the shoulder, and told to continue with the good work18:48
*** jophish has joined #meego18:48
lbtali12341: that person was "the carrier" for that period. Probably just along the street.18:48
lbtRST38h: now you're just trolling18:48
RST38hlbt: As opposed to the inquiry into "why the hell are we wasting money on this empty web site?"18:48
lbtssvb: nope. It's the right license18:49
*** Openfree^ has quit IRC18:49
RST38hlbt: wish I were.18:49
lbtRST38h: ? not following18:49
ali12341lbt: it's a bit far from "don't do work for other people while we're paying you" to "don't do work for other people ever again"18:49
RST38hlbt: One more time18:49
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego18:49
*** halvors has joined #meego18:49
lbt(the empty website reference)18:50
ssvblbt: If you need additional blanket protection to be enforced on everyone to make it work for you the way you want, then it is not the right license for you. Period.18:50
lbtssvb: pay attention18:50
RST38hlbt: Your view: "AppUp people are working on enabling the ecosystem, so why shouldn't they do what I say with my GPLed app, as this will be for the best of the ecosystem"18:50
lbtthere is no restriction18:50
lbtRST38h: yep18:50
*** goutam_ has joined #meego18:50
*** stefanoP has quit IRC18:51
*** imppu has quit IRC18:51
*** goutam__ has quit IRC18:51
RST38hlbt: Their view: "If we let anyone withdraw their stuff from our store, what will be left? So, let us include every single thing we can legally include there."18:51
*** stefanoP has joined #meego18:51
jonnorespecially since that will be less work18:51
lbtRST38h: no. That's your view of their view18:51
*** imppu has joined #meego18:51
*** goutam__ has joined #meego18:51
RST38hlbt: Right.18:51
RST38hlbt: But I have got your point of view right? Why do you think I have got their point of view wrong?18:52
lbtAlong with the general "MeeGo will fail, why bother" yadda yadaa18:52
RST38hNo18:52
RST38hIn fact, I do not believe that Meego will fail.18:52
lbtRST38h: I spent several hours with them18:52
*** ksinny has joined #meego18:52
lbtand... if they don't do what I say... then I will believe you18:52
RST38hIt *may*, but it is just one of the outcomes18:52
jonnorlbt: why not simply let app packages maintained by copyrightholders / upstream project get a special annotation18:52
RST38hlbt: Ok.18:52
ssvblbt: the restriction is that if I want to use someone's else code in my work (not necessarily yours, maybe from a guy who understands GPL the right way :) ), then I would have additional potential troubles with AppUp.18:53
jonnorshowing the user that by supporting this version, they are endorsing the original18:53
lbtssvb: ah... you want to sell someone elses code at AppUp.... gotcha18:53
ssvblbt: and I don't want these troubles, because GPL explicitly grants me some rights18:53
RST38hThe trouble here is not with AppUp though. It is with the GPL itself, being unsuitable for business18:53
RST38hWait, wrong wording.18:53
jonnorideally there would also be some way in the app store UI to filter based on this18:53
lbtRST38h: OK ... but the GPL is a redistribution license18:54
RST38hMake it "unsuitable for software business"18:54
lbtssvb: it doesn't give you the rights you think it gives you18:54
RST38hIf I am making a gadget, or selling services, GPL is a godsend to me18:54
lbtit does not give you the right to force others to do anything18:54
ssvblbt: ever heard about the libraries and code reuse?18:55
ali12341lbt: you still haven't explained how what you seek is *morally* compatible with the GPL18:55
lbtRST38h: honestly... this isn't sw business... it's 1-man apps.... toys18:55
*** halvors1 has joined #meego18:55
lbtssvb: yes...18:55
RST38hlbt: As long as you are mamking money selling them,it is business18:55
RST38hs/mamking/making18:55
*** goutam_ has quit IRC18:55
lbtRST38h: yeah... so's a paper round....18:55
ssvblbt: in the modern world a lot of work is based on the work done by somebody else, people don't reinvent wheels...18:55
lbtssvb: yep18:56
RST38hlbt: Hey, I am approaching this formally18:56
RST38hlbt: Besides, lots of people are either making or hoping to make money selling this crap18:56
lbtRST38h: yeah..... *giggle*18:56
RST38hlbt: *exactly*18:56
*** halvors has quit IRC18:57
lbtthey will make enough  for a nice meal every now and again ... if they're lucky18:57
lbtas most IOS devs eventually discover18:57
lbta few will make a lot ... sure18:57
lbtmost won't18:57
ssvblbt: Then you should get the point. GPL was invented to promote progress and code reuse18:58
lbtthis is about recognition, a few $$ here and there for GPL devs to get some beer18:58
lbtssvb: do you seriously think I don't know the GPL very well indeed18:58
RST38hlbt: That is why app stores suck.18:58
alteregoI think if people actually cared to make money they wouldn't release their code under gpl in the first place :)18:58
ali12341i seriously think you understand the technicalities but miss the point of the philosophy18:58
lbtRST38h: yep....18:58
RST38hlbt: and so does Apple's model, at least for developers18:58
lbtalterego: indeed18:59
lbtali12341: nope.... you do18:59
ali12341no u18:59
ssvblbt: yes do, otherwise you would not have started this silly discussion :)18:59
RST38hlbt: It is a supermarket with all the isles turned sideways to the customer18:59
lbthehe18:59
lbtssvb: and ali12341 I'm still looking for something that contravenes the GPL19:00
lbtin my proposal19:00
ali12341lbt: i've been saying for the past hour or so that i don't care about legality19:00
lbtother than your opinion of the philosophy19:00
*** MostafaDaneshvar has quit IRC19:00
ali12341i only care about morality of doing what you propose19:00
lbtnb... I'm GPL3 compliant too19:00
jonnorlbt: philosophically you effectively want to limit redistribution19:01
*** Richrd has joined #meego19:01
lbtjonnor: no, not really19:01
lbtjonnor: it's still on AppUp19:01
jonnorwhat?19:01
lbtI put it there... it costs $219:01
lbtali12341 then wants to copy it and sell it for $119:02
lbtmy app19:02
lbthe has GPL rights you know19:02
lbtand morality is on his side19:02
ali12341you granted me that right when you released it GPL19:02
ali12341and now you want to take it away19:02
lbtno, I didn't19:02
jonnoryes, you effectively restricted his redistrubtion of it19:02
lbtI gave you the right to *try* and sell it19:02
lbtI restrict his ability to negotiate with my partner19:02
ali12341and now you want to take away my right to even *try* to sell it, since it won't be for sale19:02
lbtyou can sell it19:03
jonnoryes, you effectively restricted his redistrubtion of it by having a party that is not legally obliged to redistribute deny him to redistribute through their channel19:03
lbtgo down to any market... I won't complain19:03
lbtyeah, and19:03
lbtthat is not restricting his rights19:03
ali12341yes it is19:03
lbtat all19:03
lbtno it's not.. they are not "rights"19:04
ali12341stop oppressing me19:04
berndhsthe customer in this case is AppUp, not the end user19:04
lbtthey are commercial contracts19:04
lbtand AppUp *want* (in my mind) this19:04
lbtthey *like* to make me happy19:04
lbtI write code for their store19:04
ali12341isn't this a little bit like... a cartel doing price fixing?19:04
*** Matan[M] has joined #meego19:04
*** ketas has quit IRC19:05
lbtyou piss me offf (not really... in the scenario)19:05
ali12341heh19:05
lbtali12341: yes19:05
lbtit's called "free market"19:05
berndhsits only a cartel if it controls a significant percentage of the market19:05
jonnorlbt: and you think that is within the philosophy of the gpl?19:05
lbtbecause AppUp doesn't have a monopoly19:05
lbtfree market?19:05
lbtthe GPL is all for competition19:05
lcukwhat if appup would accept any GPL app if it included a contribution breakdown as additional verification?19:05
*** thiago_ has joined #meego19:06
lbtlcuk: I kept clear until the black/white is understood19:06
lcukno contribution breakdown, not on the store19:06
*** thiago has quit IRC19:06
lbtif we can't agree on an app that is 100% mine...19:06
lcukthe breakdown there is 100% David19:06
lcukno qualms19:06
ali12341if it's really 100% yours then the solution is simple: instead of setting up an illegal cartel to do price fixing... simply DONT USE GPL19:06
lcuklbt, consider it like the signing off process19:07
lbtali12341: hehe.... grow up "illegal cartel"?? :)19:07
w00t_there is nothing illegal about it19:07
ali12341i would rather you don't use GPL for such morally questionable enterprises19:07
w00t_just because you don't like an idea does not make it illegal19:07
lbtlcuk: yeah, could do that... but I suspect AppUp will say "not 100%, no $$$"19:07
berndhs1 person trying to get a fair (small) price for 1 app is not an "illegal cartel" ?19:07
lbtthat would be a good policy IMHO19:07
*** thiago_ has quit IRC19:08
*** thiago_ has joined #meego19:08
*** thiago_ is now known as thiago19:08
lcuklbt, but if you include the account names of each participant19:08
lbtso, feel free to package VLC - but no you can't sell it19:08
ali12341two parties colluding to fix prices = a cartel19:08
*** foolano has quit IRC19:08
lbthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel19:08
lbt"competing firms"19:09
Myrttimmmm pizza with blue cheese19:09
ali12341ok fair point19:09
*** arvind_k is now known as arvind_khadri19:09
lbtme and AppUp.... we're "like that" .... ;)19:09
lbtseriously....19:09
lbtwhere "me" == "any GPL dev"19:09
*** arvind_khadri has quit IRC19:09
*** arvind_khadri has joined #meego19:09
lbtnot "any GPL rights holder"19:09
jonnorlbt: You stated before that the copyright holders libraries included/used by an app should also have a say. Why should the appup not ask for "permission" to redistribute app X from every copyright holder all the way down to the kernel? Where is the line drawn?19:10
lbtAppUp are not interested in distributing GPL code...19:10
lbtjonnor: agreed19:10
lbt2 reasons19:10
*** vasvlad_ has joined #meego19:10
w00t_the GPL is pretty explicit on what comprises a derived work19:10
lbt1: AppUp are not shipping anything other than my code19:10
lbt2: MeeGo is shipping the rest19:10
*** foolano has joined #meego19:10
lbtw00t_: I'm very very serious about proposing this to AppUp... do you have an issue with what I'm saying?19:12
lbtali12341: I think we still disagree - but thanks for making me argue. I'm pretty happy that we'd get a little closer in an in-person debate.19:13
w00t_lbt: not in principle.. my only issue comes to what happens with (active) forks, and so on19:13
ssvblbt: hopefully they will reject your proposal, why can't you solve YOUR problem in such a way which does not bother other people?19:14
lbt*nod* ... and contributions back to my proj19:14
jonnorlbt: so as the author of any non-meego library, I will/can be asked to give redistribution permission for any app using that?19:14
lbtssvb: I think you missed something... your args don't make sense19:14
w00t_ssvb: who is this bothering?19:14
lbtjonnor: IMHO... you have to make the objection19:14
lbtjonnor: this is a courtesy to prevent leeching19:15
jonnorlbt: Ok. But I am entitled to?19:15
*** Matan[M] has quit IRC19:15
lbtyes19:15
ssvbw00t_: I'm as a GPL application developer don't want to deal with this crap19:15
lbtjonnor: not obliged to19:15
lbtssvb: you don't have to ... in any way19:15
berndhsssvb: if you dont deal with it, nobody will bother you19:15
w00t_ssvb: you aren't obliged to19:15
lbtwe won't ask you, we'll sell your code... np19:16
lbt(and give away the src)19:16
ali12341and.... he won't mind?19:16
jonnorThis seems like a strange power to give library devs. Especially if the library is licensed LGPL or more liberal, an appliation developer would not expect the library to be able to do such.19:16
lbtno, he GPL'ed it19:16
ali12341exactly19:16
berndhswe'll take the money, get some nice booze, and toast you in your absence19:16
lbtjonnor: it's not a legal power19:16
jonnorlbt: no, but it is still a power19:17
lbtjonnor: feel free to help me refine the policy19:17
lbtbear in mind the meego model19:17
lbtwhich is "no libs"19:17
ali12341jonnor: i don't see how libraries and the platform have anything to do with it. the only thing that matters is what you download from appup in the package19:17
lbt(which I hate btw)19:17
lbtand I am working my fingers to the bone doing a truly 'free' solution for those of us not buying apps at Dixons19:18
jonnoras an application devleoper mainly targetting Meego and AppUp, I might find myself in the situation that I wrote 10k lines of code that depend on library X, and then the copyright holder of that lib can suddenly cause me to have to stop redistribution in that channel19:18
jonnorperhaps because he did not like my face19:18
lbtyes19:18
lbtif that bothers you... don't use GPL19:18
lbtnot sure about LGPL19:18
ali12341no19:18
jonnorhah19:18
lbtthis is *policy*19:18
ssvbjonner: exactly19:18
ali12341that's completely backwards19:18
jonnorthere is nothing in GPL that would suggest this19:19
lbtif you think that a GPL dev will veto your code and that bothers you...19:19
jonnorit *can* happen, sure, with the setup you have proposed19:19
ali12341to paraphrase what you just said: "if you are worried about developers preventing you from redistributing code, don't use GPL"19:19
lbtso...19:19
lbtdo you think it's a high risk ?19:19
lbtI don't19:19
jonnorbut I do not see any interpretation that says this is an intent of the GPL19:19
ali12341it's not a high risk... unless you get your way19:19
lbtali12341: so if I used your GPL code you'd veto my app ?19:20
ali12341lbt: i'd veto your app unless you agreed not to veto my app19:20
lbtindeed19:20
ali12341lbt: result: mutually assured destruction19:20
lbtthen we get drunk together19:20
lbtor that19:20
lcukspeaking of which, I should unpack my ideapad, jake was asking to play tictactoe on it before19:21
RST38hI think the solution to this fiery argument can best be summarized: "go by the letter of GPL *or* license under different terms"19:21
ali12341s/letter/spirit/19:21
RST38hforget the spirit, spirit is subjective19:21
ssvbali12341: wrong19:21
RST38hthe letter is not though, so obey that19:21
*** kW_ has quit IRC19:21
ali12341i'm not convinced that the idea is against the letetr of the GPL19:22
berndhsgoing by the spirit ensure those with better lawyers win :P19:22
RST38hali: It is, reread the GPL19:22
*** puffin has joined #meego19:22
jonnorRST38h: I don't think lbts proposed way is against the letter of the GPL. Key being that the party limiting redistribution (appup) is not obliged to redistribute19:22
ssvbali12341: by the letter of GPL you grant the others the same redistribution rights as you have. And if you legally can't grant this right when using AppUp, then you can't use AppUp yourself19:23
RST38hjonnor: key being that appup is not supposed to give a flying fuck about lbt's attempts at vetoing redistribution19:23
jonnorRST38h: there is no legal ground for them havint to do that, is there?19:24
RST38hjonnor: now, it *may*, if lbt asks nicely, but in general case it doesnot have to19:24
RST38hjonnor: yes, there is no legal ground for the veto19:24
w00t_how is that against the letter of the GPL?19:24
jonnorYes, they are allowed to. Ergo, the letter of the GPL is not enough.19:24
w00t_exactly19:25
RST38hjonnor: Once again: the letter of the gPL explicitely ALLOWS them to redistribute, veto or not19:25
RST38hjonnor: If "GPL is not enough" then lbt should not license under GPL19:25
jonnorI have not claimed otherwise.19:25
berndhsright, the veto is between lbt and AppUp19:25
RST38hright19:25
lcukusing the contribution breakdown, redistribution would continue and be happy19:25
*** puffin has quit IRC19:26
ali12341lcuk: no because it also places additional restrictions: "you can only redistribute if you give me x%"19:26
ali12341lcuk: although it is morally better than lbt's idea :)19:26
lcukali12341, it is their server, they ask for other restrictions anyway19:26
lcukyou are not granted a right to automatically upload anything19:26
jonnorI do not think lbt proposed solution is a very good one to encouraging development of free software apps.19:26
berndhsI think lbt's proposal will discourage leeches19:27
lbtsec... fixing LDAP19:27
lcukali12341, the breakdwon would simply give the store owners a viable way to ensure the authors get the designated recognition19:27
jonnorberndhs: and that there are no better solution to doing that?19:27
* RST38h suggests using a community operated repo, Maemo-style, rather than rely on AppUp19:27
ali12341i think leeches will be discouraged by the fact that leeching will result in the price dropping to zero19:27
berndhsjonnor: you have a better proposal ?19:28
lbtat last19:28
ssvbberndhs: it will not, the leeches are only going to benefit from some dumb guys using GPL19:28
lcukwith breakdown, leeches will be discouraged until substantial changes have been made anywayu19:28
RST38hYou get more control over the repo + no need to go through the ugly flash-heavy web site19:28
*** DocScrutinizer is now known as DocScrutinyou19:28
RST38hAnd if someone uploads your stuff to AppUp, well, such is life19:29
ssvbberndhs: so it's not a problem at all, those who want to make profit will use a different license19:29
*** DocScrutinyou is now known as DocScrutinizer19:29
*** DocScrutinizer is now known as DocScrutinyou19:29
*** DocScrutinyou is now known as DocScrutinizer19:29
ali12341the fact of the matter is that the veto can and will be used to stiffle real competition19:29
timophssvb: exactly19:29
lbtRST38h: we'll use just the c.obs when you get Dixons signed up19:29
ali12341ie the case where someone adds valuable functionality19:29
berndhsI think some of the anti-lbt arguments here are in favour of $0 software for all end users19:30
jonnorberndhs: Perhaps. 1) Make it clear on apps that are packages and maintained by upstream that they are so. 2) Let the appstore and frontend favor such apps over others19:30
lbtberndhs: yep...19:30
RST38hlbt: not familiar with either of the entities19:30
*** gaveen__ has joined #meego19:30
lbthigh street store and open app store19:30
lcukali12341, at that point, the contribution breakdown would change and fees obtained would be shared in a balanced way19:30
ssvbberndhs: no, the anti-lbt arguments are to ensure that open source projects with multiple contributors (and many copyright holders as a result) will not have any troubles getting to AppUp19:31
ali12341lcuk: not under the veto plan19:31
lbtssvb: why would they?19:31
*** andyross has quit IRC19:31
ali12341lcuk: under the veto plan, the original author would veto the version with extended functions19:31
ssvblbt: what if some of the contributors can't be found to explicitly grant their permission?19:32
lbtali12341: *would*?19:32
*** gaveen_ has quit IRC19:32
ali12341lcuk: then the original version wouldn't be able to incorporate the extras either, because the author author would veto that19:32
lbtali12341: surely *could*19:32
lbtssvb: did you not listen?19:32
lbtno persmission needed19:32
berndhsssvb: if they can't be found to grant, they can't be found to veto eitehr19:32
ali12341lbt: yeah "could" in the sense that politicians "could" be corrupt19:32
ali12341ie it definitely will happen eventually19:33
lbtali12341: so GPL devs tend to be corrupt?19:33
ssvblbt: of course they can show up later, and I don;t want this to happen19:33
lbtssvb: yeah ... like VLC did19:33
ali12341lbt: humans tend to be corrupt, yeah19:33
lbtthey have a moral objection to apple/intel shipping their code19:33
ali12341human nature19:33
lbtali12341: so your problem is that you don't trust GPL devs19:34
ali12341lbt: yeah19:34
berndhsagain, some poeple here assume only GPL devs are evil, while forkers and copuiers are all nice people19:34
ali12341lbt: if i trusted them i wouldn't need the GPL19:34
lbtand you think they'll stop you using their GPL code19:34
lbthehe19:34
pexino one is evil, nature of power just is19:34
*** vilvo has joined #meego19:34
ali12341lbt: yes, since that's *exactly* what you are doing19:34
lbtthe devs don't trust you you fool19:34
lbtlbt doesn't protect you19:34
lbtit protects them from you19:34
lbtGPL19:34
lbtROFL19:35
ali12341i don't think it, you have explicitly stated it to be the case for the whole of this discussion19:35
*** srag has quit IRC19:35
ssvbberndhs: what about a random corrupt contributor of some tiny feature years ago? who decided that he wants to have his share of profit (if there is any) or a minute of fame now19:35
lbtno, I think if you read the backlog I have a very solid stance19:35
ali12341GPL protects software from developers19:35
lbtssvb: yes... indeed19:35
ali12341RMS is very clear on this19:35
lbtyou are not software (I think)19:36
berndhsi'm in favour of original authors benefiting form their work19:36
berndhsi'm not in favour of users having an eternal right to more services from the original authors19:36
timophif a dev is after $$ and distribution control GPL isn't the lisence to use19:37
*** DocScrutinizer is now known as ^19:38
Myrttidepending on the revenue model19:38
*** ^ is now known as DocScrutinizer19:38
berndhsif someone uses version 1.2.3 legitimately, under ANY license, they dont have rights to 1.2.419:38
*** DocScrutinizer has quit IRC19:39
w00t_berndhs: where did anyone say anything to the contrary? :p19:39
*** DocScrutinizer has joined #meego19:40
w00t_(i'm admittedly not following the discussion too closely)19:40
berndhsw00t_: basically the arguments "what if the dev changes their mind" imply that the dev has to keep giving thigns away19:40
ali12341berndhs: what if they change their mind about 1.2.3?19:41
berndhsthey can't19:41
RST38hAgain: would like an option to change your mind => do not use GPL19:41
ali12341berndhs: under the veto model they can have all 1.2.3 using software removed from appup19:41
RST38hAnd this is both in GPL spirit and letter19:41
berndhsno, just copies provided by others19:41
w00t_RST38h: nothing prevents relicensing away from GPL, assuming you hold all copyright or gain permission from all copyright holders19:41
ali12341berndhs: yes, and they can obviously choose to remove their own copy19:41
berndhsthis is about an App store, not a Lib store19:41
w00t_so, GPL doesn't stop you changing your mind19:41
*** gaveen_ has joined #meego19:42
berndhsthey can stop selling their app yes19:42
*** mortenvp has quit IRC19:42
berndhsor stop giving it away on that one store19:42
ali12341w00t_: it doesn't make the old copy no longer GPL19:42
w00t_ali12341: correct19:42
w00t_(the same is true of any other license)19:42
berndhsanyone can still get the app through other channels19:42
ali12341berndhs: "on that one store" soon turns into "on all app stores"19:42
berndhsand if someone decides to stop giving their stuff away, why is that wrong ?19:43
ali12341berndhs: because the GPL explicitly states that others may continue to do so19:43
ali12341berndhs: and the veto explicitly takes away that right from others19:43
berndhsif you give away now or sell for $3, that doesnt give me a right to get it for the same conditions tomorrow19:44
*** maligor has joined #meego19:44
berndhsthe veto is for that one store19:44
ali12341berndhs: that one store may be the only way to obtain the software on certain devices19:44
berndhswhy does the store have an obligation to let me sell a copy of your app ?19:44
*** piggz has joined #meego19:44
berndhsthey buy other devices19:44
*** gaveen__ has quit IRC19:44
berndhss/they/then/19:44
ali12341berndhs: it has a moral obligation, but not a legal one19:44
lbtali12341: "that veto" is like saying that I *must* sell your stuff in my yard-sale19:45
ali12341berndhs: more of the "then don't use it" argument19:45
lbt(objecting to)19:45
ali12341what has not been explained is why they have a moral obligation to honour the wishes of developers who used GPL?19:45
berndhsali12341: right, same as the "dont user GPL" argument19:45
lbtBTW... is OBS OK now people?19:45
* timoph checks19:46
ali12341they have no obligation to carry *any* software in their appstore19:46
vasvlad_no I can't login19:46
*** gaveen_ has quit IRC19:46
berndhslbt: i can log in now19:46
timophlbt: yep. works for me19:46
*** ahiemstra has quit IRC19:46
lbtvasvlad_: try again... I'll watch19:46
vasvlad_and me too19:47
lbtthat worked19:47
lbtgood19:47
vasvlad_fine19:47
lbt:)19:47
berndhsexcellent, I can now proceed with work so Ali can copy it and make $3 :P19:48
lbtberndhs: you can! :D19:49
timoph:=19:49
lbtit's his moral right!19:49
ali12341it certainly is :)19:49
lbtnot if we conspire against you ;)19:50
ali12341well yes19:50
lbtSo, I think I need to think about both LGPL and GPL libs and multi-author apps19:51
ali12341(17:44:51) berndhs: they buy other devices <- this isn't the same as the "don't use GPL" argument19:51
lbtalso some sense of 'significant contribution'19:51
ali12341because a GPL violation is a GPL violation regardless of if i buy it or not19:52
ali12341otoh, if you don't use GPL in the first place, there can be no violation19:52
berndhsit is the same argument, in the sense of not being forced into the deal19:52
ali12341it's not the same argument at all19:52
berndhsand lets face it, none of the end users need any of these apps19:52
berndhsthese are phones and tablets, 95% of it is entertainment19:53
ali12341so that makes it OK?19:53
*** amjad has joined #meego19:53
berndhsit makes it OK to say end-users dont need it for a certain price19:53
*** halvors has joined #meego19:54
*** halvors1 has quit IRC19:54
berndhsthey are not actually any worse off without it19:54
ali12341the argument you are making is that it's fine to violate the GPL as long as you only distribute to people who don't care about the GPL19:54
berndhsno, there is no GPL violation19:55
ali12341so i've got an idea, let's just make the appup store have a click thru agreement "you agree not to hold any developers to the GPL"19:55
berndhsonly a deal between developers and a distributor19:55
ali12341that way the developer isn't violating the GPL because they don't impose that condition19:55
berndhsall the source code will be published, and anyone can use it as they see fit19:55
ali12341appup does19:55
*** Christie has joined #meego19:56
berndhsthey jsut can't install the executable through appup19:56
ali12341except they can't because the appup terms are discriminatory19:56
berndhsyes the appup terms discrimintate against plagiarists and thieves :)19:56
berndhshow terrible19:57
lbt*g*19:57
ali12341if you think that rights holders under the GPL are "plagiarists and thieves" then you have no business using GPL at all19:57
berndhsthat is backwards19:57
berndhsusers are granted privileges by the GPL19:58
ali12341if you have no business using the GPl then you think rights holders under the GPL are plagiarists and thieves?19:58
*** mpoirier has joined #meego19:58
berndhspeople who copy and resell in direct competition to the original author are plagiarists yes19:58
berndhspretending that it is their work19:58
ali12341well no19:58
berndhsyes they are19:58
ali12341because nobody said they would remove the original credits19:59
berndhsas if anybody looks at the credits19:59
*** andyross has joined #meego19:59
berndhsBob will say "this is Alices program, buy it from Alice for $5 or from me for $3" ??19:59
ali12341yes19:59
berndhsno, Bob will say " this does waht Alices does"20:00
ali12341i suppose you think centos project is nothing but plagiarists and thieves?20:00
*** Openfree^ has quit IRC20:00
berndhsyou are assuming those who copy are honest, and those who create are evil20:00
berndhsthat is backwards20:00
ali12341no, i am assuming that those who seek to take away rights are evil20:00
ali12341and everyone else is simply neutral20:01
RST38hali: No, no20:01
berndhsthose who give away rights you mean20:01
piggzare any instllation images available for nonsse3 cpu's ?20:01
RST38hali: They are brainless, no-good plagiarists and thieves!20:01
ali12341berndhs: those who give away rights, and then try to go back on the deal, rather than simply not giving away those rights in the first palce20:01
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego20:01
berndhsnobody is proposing going back on the deal20:01
berndhsjust limiting through 1 specific distribution channel20:02
RST38hand what about the other channels?20:02
*** panaggio_ has quit IRC20:02
ali12341berndhs: the only reason it's "1 specific channel" is because it's the only channel that exists today20:02
RST38hwill you have private discussions with each, making them allow you a veto?20:02
jonnorberndhs: so it has a limited scope. They are still going back on the deal in that scope20:02
berndhsAppIp doesnt exist today, there are no divices20:02
RST38hali: You mean, you can no longer install from a repo, using zypper or something?20:02
RST38hberndhs <--- goood spotter!20:03
berndhsAppUp cannot prevent anyone from setting up their own repo20:03
ali12341berndhs: and neither does the proposed veto :)20:03
jonnorRST38h: there is no guarantee that will be possible on a end-user Meego device20:03
RST38hMakes me wonder why nobody else has noticed it so far20:03
jonnorwell, officially or enabled-by-default repos at least20:03
lbtpiggz: ... I guess you don't mean ARM ;)20:03
*** Openfree^ has quit IRC20:04
*** bigbrovar has joined #meego20:04
*** Openfree^ has joined #meego20:04
*** balor has quit IRC20:05
* RST38h wants a special license that will let him distribute to a limited number of people he personally likes, with no redistribution and will also allow to withdraw the app if he stops liking the person =)20:05
timoph:)20:05
lbtRST38h: that's a valid license ... feel free... not OSI though... mine is20:05
RST38hWait, doesn't it sound like a blog for apps? =)20:05
*** lbt is now known as lbt_away20:06
*** maligor has quit IRC20:06
lbt_awaybbl8r20:06
timopho/20:06
berndhsRST38h: sounds like software-as-a-service20:06
RST38hg'night lbt20:06
RST38hberndhs: true20:06
piggzlbt_away: no, i'd like ot run meego on me wifes celeron laptop20:06
*** vetoketju has quit IRC20:08
*** maligor has joined #meego20:09
*** berndhs_meego has joined #meego20:12
*** berndhs_meego has left #meego20:15
*** panaggio_ has joined #meego20:15
*** onen|openBmap has joined #meego20:25
*** amjad has quit IRC20:30
*** Venemo has joined #meego20:31
*** bigbrovar has quit IRC20:33
*** ksinny has quit IRC20:33
*** kraiskil has joined #meego20:34
*** lbt_away is now known as lbt20:34
lbtpiggz: currently there's no generic x86 port of MeeGo - we would all like to see it ... but it's all about time20:35
piggzlbt: gonna give opensuse smeegol a whirl20:35
berndhspiggz: is there a recent release of that ?20:37
*** MacDrunk has joined #meego20:37
piggzberndhs: feb this year20:37
piggzberndhs: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Meego:/Netbook/images/iso/ is what i found20:38
berndhsah thanks20:38
*** maligor has quit IRC20:41
*** amjad has joined #meego20:42
*** ksinny has joined #meego20:48
*** amjad has quit IRC20:54
*** goutam_ has joined #meego20:58
*** stefanoP has quit IRC20:58
*** imppu has quit IRC20:58
*** goutam__ has quit IRC20:58
*** stefanoP has joined #meego20:59
*** goutam__ has joined #meego20:59
*** imppu has joined #meego20:59
*** goutam_ has quit IRC21:03
*** loft306 has joined #meego21:04
*** foolano has quit IRC21:06
*** balor has joined #meego21:06
*** balor has quit IRC21:07
*** amjad has joined #meego21:07
*** piggz has quit IRC21:08
*** wmarone__ has joined #meego21:09
*** wmarone_ has quit IRC21:09
*** mpoirier has quit IRC21:11
*** piggz has joined #meego21:13
*** wmarone__ has quit IRC21:13
*** wmarone__ has joined #meego21:13
*** pohly has quit IRC21:18
*** toabctl has quit IRC21:19
*** Venemo has quit IRC21:20
*** Tsarpf has joined #meego21:21
*** Venemo has joined #meego21:21
*** MostafaDaneshvar has joined #meego21:25
*** amjad has quit IRC21:25
*** balor has joined #meego21:25
*** kW_ has joined #meego21:31
*** Joppeffs has joined #meego21:39
*** Richrd_ has joined #meego21:39
*** vasvlad_ has quit IRC21:43
*** stefanoP has quit IRC21:45
*** goutam_ has joined #meego21:45
*** goutam__ has quit IRC21:45
*** notmart has quit IRC21:45
*** goutam__ has joined #meego21:45
*** arvind_khadri has quit IRC21:46
*** mikhas has joined #meego21:46
*** stefanoP has joined #meego21:46
*** juliank has quit IRC21:47
*** goutam_ has quit IRC21:48
*** goutam_ has joined #meego21:48
*** stefanoP has quit IRC21:48
*** imppu has quit IRC21:48
*** goutam__ has quit IRC21:48
*** goutam__ has joined #meego21:49
*** stefanoP has joined #meego21:49
*** imppu has joined #meego21:49
*** Richrd__ has joined #meego21:53
*** goutam_ has quit IRC21:53
*** Richrd_ has quit IRC21:54
*** goutam_ has joined #meego21:55
*** imppu has quit IRC21:55
*** stefanoP has quit IRC21:55
*** goutam__ has quit IRC21:55
*** goutam__ has joined #meego21:55
*** stefanoP has joined #meego21:55
*** imppu has joined #meego21:56
*** Joppeffs has quit IRC21:59
*** goutam_ has quit IRC22:00
*** halvors has quit IRC22:02
*** psycho_oreos has quit IRC22:07
*** thiago has quit IRC22:08
*** Richrd has quit IRC22:08
*** mtux has quit IRC22:09
*** thiago has joined #meego22:09
*** goutam_ has joined #meego22:09
*** imppu has quit IRC22:10
*** goutam__ has quit IRC22:10
*** stefanoP has quit IRC22:10
*** goutam__ has joined #meego22:10
*** imppu has joined #meego22:10
*** stefanoP has joined #meego22:11
*** beford has joined #meego22:13
*** terietor has joined #meego22:13
*** goutam_ has quit IRC22:14
*** ksinny has quit IRC22:16
*** thiagoss has joined #meego22:23
*** panaggio_ has quit IRC22:26
*** larin has joined #meego22:28
*** Jade has quit IRC22:35
*** stefanoP has quit IRC22:38
*** imppu has quit IRC22:38
*** goutam_ has joined #meego22:38
*** goutam__ has quit IRC22:38
*** goutam__ has joined #meego22:38
*** stefanoP has joined #meego22:39
*** imppu has joined #meego22:40
*** MostafaDaneshvar has quit IRC22:41
*** goutam_ has quit IRC22:42
*** mmeeks has joined #meego22:43
*** mmeeks has joined #meego22:43
*** foolano has joined #meego22:43
*** sergiusens has joined #meego22:44
*** dl9pf_ has joined #meego22:46
*** dl9pf has quit IRC22:47
*** dazo_afk has joined #meego22:50
*** Jade has joined #meego22:52
*** goutam_ has joined #meego22:53
*** tbf has joined #meego22:53
*** goutam__ has quit IRC22:53
*** imppu has quit IRC22:53
*** stefanoP has quit IRC22:53
*** Richrd has joined #meego22:54
*** goutam__ has joined #meego22:54
*** stefanoP1 has joined #meego22:54
*** imppu has joined #meego22:55
*** Venemo has quit IRC22:56
*** Venemo has joined #meego22:56
*** Richrd__ has quit IRC22:57
*** goutam_ has quit IRC22:58
*** Venemo has quit IRC22:58
*** terietor has quit IRC23:01
*** swc|666 has joined #meego23:12
*** mmeeks has left #meego23:13
*** Venemo has joined #meego23:20
*** terietor has joined #meego23:21
*** sergiusens has quit IRC23:24
*** Vanadis__ has joined #meego23:25
*** piggz_ has joined #meego23:27
*** kaitlin__ has joined #meego23:27
*** kaitlin_ has quit IRC23:27
*** kaitlin__ has quit IRC23:27
*** kaitlin__ has joined #meego23:27
*** piggz has quit IRC23:27
*** loft306 has quit IRC23:27
*** rescbr has quit IRC23:27
*** rescbr has joined #meego23:28
*** Vanadis has quit IRC23:28
*** loft306 has joined #meego23:28
*** loft306 is now known as Guest4752523:29
*** mikecomputing has quit IRC23:29
*** swc|666 has quit IRC23:30
*** Venemo has quit IRC23:30
*** Venemo has joined #meego23:32
*** MostafaDaneshvar has joined #meego23:37
*** djszapi has joined #meego23:38
djszapiHi! Has anybody tried to install KDE on an Intel, exopc hardware ?23:38
* andre__ wonders how this is a MeeGo question23:45
djszapithere is a meego running on that and this gadget was distributed yesterday at the meego summit.23:45
dm8tbrmaybe he wants to put kde on meego :)23:50
djszapiyup.23:50
berndhswhy ?23:52
djszapibecause I like KDE.23:53
timophwhy not?23:53
berndhsbut then why on meego ? run something else on the exopc23:55
Venemowhat is an exopc?23:55
timophlast I checked the UX layer wasn't a part of MeeGo compliance so AFAIK MeeGo with KDE would be compliant23:55
timophVenemo: it's a tablet23:56
mikhasit's a freebie23:56
berndhsisnt it the same hardware as WeTab ?23:56
timophthat too :)23:56
djszapiberndhs: nope.23:57
berndhsi thought I read that on a mailing list some time ago23:57
djszapiyeah, very very similar, but not the same :)23:57
berndhswhat different ? they painted some buttons pink ?23:58
*** balor has quit IRC23:58
Myrttiamerican/canadian brand vs. european brand23:58
*** kW_ has quit IRC23:59
Venemomhm23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!