IRC log of #europython for Saturday, 2008-05-24

zethokay my poor attempt at making a new UK Python logo00:07
zethhttp://files.zeth.net/flag.png00:07
zethnot very good of course00:07
zethbut I have no graphics skills at all00:07
zethOeuf de serpent trying to be a flag00:08
pboddiezeth: Nice idea, though. Perhaps you could adapt a Union Jack to be more serpent-like.00:13
*** lac has quit IRC00:21
zethwell I think something that is similar proportions to the proprietary Python logo00:21
zethbut one is facing left and one is right00:22
*** jacob22 has quit IRC00:22
*** jacob22 has joined #europython00:22
zethanother cool idea would be a snake whose tail opens like a saxophone00:25
zethjoke on the fact that the UK event is held in a music college00:26
*** lac has joined #europython00:32
lacpboddie: honesty is best policy.  say that we are short about 12 and would like to extend things00:41
pboddieI've made a blog entry, but I can always edit it: http://europython.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/extension-of-the-talk-submissions-period-for-europython-2008/00:42
pboddieIf we're really desperate, I can always give a talk. ;-)00:43
lacwe can have a panel discussion on volunteering for ep, AND maybe we should.00:43
lacits a little weaselly for my taste.00:44
pboddieI don't think the Future of EuroPython session went that well ultimately.00:44
lacsay we have 50  submissions and we would like to have 65 -9000:44
pboddieI didn't know there'd be a Jython panel - that went completely under my radar.00:45
lacyes, i don't either, but mayube that was  because it was not run well00:45
lacmy radar as well00:45
lacI like extensions whihc are fat on details.00:45
pboddieI'd have preferred a smaller session with the people who actually organised the conference so we could at least go through what didn't go well.00:45
lacthaqt let people know the conference is not desparate, just looking to do better.00:45
lacfabio wants one of those for conference organisers.00:46
lacor would be ones.00:46
pboddieThat's the hard part of wording these announcements. ;-)00:46
lacthat's the problem with asking me for criticism -- I give lots of it, and even suggestions but it may not be any better my way00:47
pboddieThe problem with a plenary session is that most people just give the blank stare and/or agree that they could possibly do something.00:47
lacI offten only give a different one for contrast.00:47
* lac nods sadly00:47
pboddieI think people need to "buy in" somehow or be really motivated. It's a bit like people saying that Python wasn't very popular for Web applications compared to PHP and there was much denial and/or calm nodding of heads. It was only when the Rails people lit a fire under them that they pulled together.00:48
lacSome how the pyconuk mailing list seems way more motivated than the ep-improive list.00:49
lacany idea why?00:50
pboddieWell, John would say that it's the locality thing in action, or perhaps ease of collaboration.00:50
pboddieI think that conferences which blur the local and "global" elements tend to have people who are more motivated to show that they can make it a success.00:51
pboddieIt's almost an issue of pride. And if things need doing, people can easily be badgered to do them.00:51
pboddieAs someone who has hosted EP, I guess you must have some insight into such matters.00:52
lacyes but I have hosted other things which I have done, turnout wise, more successfully.00:55
lacGothcon is the largest European boardgaming  conference.00:55
lacwe get many thousands here in Gothenburg each year00:55
lacit has been going on for 31 years now, or 32 maybe.00:55
lacJacob was one of the first organisers.00:56
lacwhy does it get more volunteers than we do?00:56
lacI think -- because the bulk of volunteers are local to the event.00:56
lacand Göteborg has many orders of magnitude more gamers than vilnius has python programmers.00:57
lacbut I could be wrong about the reasons.00:57
pboddieBut a lot of this stuff doesn't really need local organisers. I think the locality thing is the major factor, but it's not really very logical.00:57
pboddieBut perhaps people don't realise that much of the stuff can be decoupled.00:58
pboddieIt's like the Web stuff, registration, talks management, reviewing, and all that can be managed separately. There are even services for this kind of thing, which is what Indico is about, but there are commercial software-as-a-service offerings as well as free (as in beer) ones.00:59
pboddieFor example, GUADEC uses such a service.00:59
pboddieBut perhaps such things make people feel distanced from the event if people aren't careful. That it's just another conference alongside hundreds of others.01:01
lacI think that what we have is too big a distance between 'I want to make something happen'01:03
lacand 'poof -- there it is'.01:03
lacIf our distance was short we could have right now a 'everybody think about what they want'01:03
lacsession for a weekend say, over irc, and get a lot of good stuff to do.01:04
lacinstead now, we get a lot of ideas that are hard to implement,01:04
lacand need code and infrastructure,01:04
lacso ... creativity lags.  badly lags.01:04
jacob22I think that our big problem is that we had some organisers who cared too little about building a community of the EuroPython volunteers, and that we lost a number of key people, without having people lined up to take their jobs. This is slowly changing, but it will take about 3 more years before we are in a comfortable situation. And bad things can happen in the meantime, unless we control the situation.01:04
lacI am not sobner now, this may not have made sense, if so I am sorry,01:05
lacit makes sense with beer,01:05
pboddieThings often do make sense with beer, however. ;-)01:05
pboddieNot 5 or more, however, in my experience. But that's just me. ;-)01:06
pboddieI think a certain volume of organisers is a good thing because it's often easier to build a consensus, which seems counterintuitive, but if you consider some kinds of decisions, someone often suggests something and then isn't sure about whether it's the right thing. With few organisational peers, that person is likely to hesitate and wait for more input (that they'll probably not get), whereas with many organisational peers with an opi01:08
pboddie confirmed more rapidly (or blown out of the water).01:08
lacwell, we have survived the decline of Zope, the creation of their own conferences by Plone01:09
pboddieIt's like a "reverse bikeshed" effect: you need people who are invested in the organisation, and then you potentially get quality decisions. Whereas with lots of opinion-givers (without a stake in the project) you just get a bikeshed effect.01:09
lacand our existence in Lithuania, where there really isn't a cadre if locals -- just aiste and that just some of the time.01:10
lacit has got to be easier to find people in the uk.01:10
jacob22lac: Yes, 3 local enthusiasts is about what is needed to get the base of the event working really well.01:13
pboddieI think that we've got reasonable infrastructure now. It's not very shiny, but it should be manageable. I think people get distracted by infrastructure and think that it's necessary to build the ultimate talk reviewing system, for example, but it's not really worth it for the volume of material being managed, especially if you have motivated people rather than some kind of Slashdot-like "mod up/down" crowd.01:14
* lac nods at pboddie01:14
lacnext year I want to set up a pre-con talk writing workshop so that we can get better talks.01:15
lacthis year not sure I CAN01:15
lacand I am drunk and sleepy and should go to bed01:15
pboddieBut perhaps the shiny aspects attract the volunteers and then you present them with the real work. However, looking at PyCon's review situation, I think they made it too easy to make things difficult, and the result was arguably lower quality reviews.01:15
lacpboddie their review system did not understand what reviewing is about, and was more a popularity system01:16
jacob22pboddie: The trick is to keep what is good and not throw it out. Then we can put the efforts into improving the aspects that suck, rather than build fro scratch every year.01:16
lacthey suffered from that, but the USA is a bad place to discuss the difference between popular and good01:16
pboddielac: Exactly. And it's a total distraction.01:16
lacbecause there are too m,a ny people for whom its the same thing.01:17
lacand the educating of them is very hard,01:17
lacand they fight it.01:17
lacbut I must sleep now.  to drunk and tired to make much sense. but plenty sober enough to say things that I regret in the morning.01:18
lacbad combination. :-)01:18
pboddielac: Yes, remember that this channel is logged. ;-)01:19
pboddieAlthough Marius can probably be paid to remove the logs if necessary. ;-)01:19
pboddiejacob22: What I wanted to do was to push forward something that was more acceptable than what had been used before. I don't see a reason to replace it in the foreseeable future, even though I'm sure people want to geotag themselves all over the conference (which you could probably do with MoinMoin by writing a macro) using a combination of Django, TurboGears and Pylons.01:20
pboddieAs far as fancy infrastructure is concerned, I liken the experience to what I have to do with databases at work: people may worry about optimising their CRUD-style Web application and their object-relational mapper for a few tens of records, but if they had to deal with the crunching of millions of records, they'd soon get a new perspective about what is good enough for each scenario.01:21
jacob22pboddie: Then they can write the software for that themselves. Anyway, I guess I'm still annoyed that the software that I spent a huge effort on developing, and which was very much liked by the users just got tossed away. I'd like that not to happen to what you have built.01:23
pboddieI have the MoinMoin mafia on my side now. ;-)01:24
jacob22I hope that is a good thing. ;-)01:25
ThomasWaldmann>:P01:27
pboddieWell, I think it mostly settles arguments (with sane people) about the community aspects of the site, which was a big problem with CPS. Plus, all the other conferences have used Wiki solutions to fairly good effect.01:27
pboddieSo, it's a solved problem as far as I'm concerned. Certainly, the UK people seem to agree, so I guess the concept will stick for another two years.01:27
pboddieAll the energy spent complaining about it can be directed elsewhere. ;-)01:28
*** MrTopf has joined #europython01:53
*** dboddie has quit IRC02:07
*** david_boddie has joined #europython02:07
*** david_boddie is now known as dboddie02:07
*** dboddie has quit IRC02:17
*** dboddie has joined #europython02:18
*** lenscape_ has quit IRC03:56
*** pboddie has left #europython04:04
*** MrTopf has quit IRC04:12
*** ThomasWaldmann has quit IRC04:33
*** ThomasWaldmann has joined #europython04:34
*** lenscape_ has joined #europython11:58
*** pedronis has joined #europython11:58
*** regebro has joined #europython14:52
*** MrTopf has joined #europython15:47
*** MrTopf has quit IRC15:51
*** regebro has left #europython15:56
*** MrTopf has joined #europython16:22
*** MrTopf has quit IRC17:15
*** pinner has joined #europython17:36
pinnerpedronis: are you here?17:36
pedronispinner: sort of17:37
pinnersorry, we have the time muddled up - UK time vs CET17:37
pinnermoreati is here, and we have started the web pages for talks...17:37
pinnersee registration.europython.eu/talk_abstracts.html...17:38
pinnerand registration.europython.eu/speaker_bios.html17:38
pinnerwe still have to put the correct logo on the header17:38
pedronisI see17:39
pinnerbut you get the ideas of what we are doing, the html gets generated off the talks data17:39
pinnerand we want to see if you are happy with it...17:39
pinnerif you're happy, we get more talks entered over the weekend17:40
pedronisyes, I need to go over the talks and see if there is something that cannot be accepted17:40
pinnerok, we can still enter them all, it's easy to delete any which are not accepted after17:40
pedronisyes, that's fine, as long as the urls are not public17:41
pedronispinner: I bookmarked the urls17:43
pedronisthanks for the work17:45
pinnerThis is Alex impersonating John. We're just tweaking the code to place the talks in the accepted categories, there was some hard coding from PyCon UK 2007 to remove. Bare with us a few more minutes.17:48
*** MrTopf has joined #europython17:48
*** MrTopf has quit IRC17:49
pinnerpedronis: We've based the talk categories on the call for proposals at http://www.europython.org/community/CallForParticipation17:50
pinnerAre you happy with these categories as is? More can be added, or changes made fairly easily.17:50
pedronispeople were supposed to give such a category in the submission?17:51
pedronisI suspect we need to get the whole picture to see how well they work for the actual talks17:51
pinnerWhere people have given no category, we've chosen a category for them.17:52
pedronisthat's ok17:52
pinnerif it's ok with you , we'll just get them all entered, them we can see what we have...17:53
pedronisindeed17:53
pinnerand change categories, reject talks then17:53
pinnerok?17:53
pedronisyes17:54
pinnerok, we'll get on with it over the weekend!17:54
* pinner says goodbye, have a good weekend17:55
*** pboddie has joined #europython17:57
*** zhanxuw has joined #europython19:36
*** zhanxuw has left #europython19:49
*** pboddie has left #europython20:19
*** pinner has quit IRC20:19
*** pedronis has quit IRC20:23
*** pinner has joined #europython20:46
*** pedronis has joined #europython21:14
*** lenscape_ has quit IRC21:18
*** pboddie has joined #europython21:34
pboddieHello! I revised the extension announcement for submissions slightly. Any comments?21:35
pboddiehttp://europython.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/extension-of-the-talk-submissions-period-for-europython-2008/21:35
jacob22pboddie: Looks very good.21:51
pboddieJust checking so that I can post messages to the lists saying more or less the same thing.21:52
dboddiejacob22: The sponsorship brochure on the Wiki has been updated.22:05
*** mgedmin has joined #europython22:27
jacob22dboddie: Thanks!23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!